Python: make eval safe [duplicate]

梦想与她 提交于 2019-11-26 10:31:29

are eval's security issues fixable or are there just too many tiny details to get it working right?

Definitely the latter -- a clever hacker will always manage to find a way around your precautions.

If you're satisfied with plain expressions using elementary-type literals only, use ast.literal_eval -- that's what it's for! For anything fancier, I recommend a parsing package, such as ply if you're familiar and comfortable with the classic lexx/yacc approach, or pyparsing for a possibly more Pythonic approach.

It is possible to get access to any class that has been defined in the process, and then you can instantiate it and invoke methods on it. It is possible to segfault the CPython interpreter, or make it quit. See this: Eval really is dangerous

The security issues are not (even close to) fixable.

I would use pyparsing to parse the expression into a list of tokens (this should not be too difficult, because the grammar is straightforward) and then handle the tokens individually.

You could also use the ast module to build a Python AST (since you are using valid Python syntax), but this may be open to subtle security holes.

Krazy Glew

Perl has a Safe eval module http://perldoc.perl.org/Safe.html

Googling "Python equivalent of Perl Safe" finds http://docs.python.org/2/library/rexec.html

but this Python "restricted exec" is deprecated.

--

overall, "eval" security, in any language, is a big issue. SQL injection attacks are just an example of such a security hole. Perl Safe has had security bugs over the years - most recent one I remember, it was safe, except for destructors on objects returned from the safe eval.

It's the sort of thing that i might use for my own tools, but not web exposed.

However, I hope that someday fully secure evals will be available in many / any languages.

标签
易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!