I've got such a code snippet:
@RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)
@PrepareForTest({Thread.class})
public class AllMeasuresDataTest {
@Before
public void setUp() throws Exception {
}
@Test
public void testGetMeasures() {
AllMeasuresData measure = new AllMeasuresData();
assertEquals(measure.getMeasures(), null);
HashMap<String, Measure> map = new HashMap<String, Measure>();
measure.setMeasures(map);
assertEquals(measure.getMeasures(), map);
measure.setMeasures(null);
assertEquals(measure.getMeasures(), null);
}
@Test
public void testAllMeasuresData() throws IOException {
ClassLoader loader = PowerMockito.mock(ClassLoader.class);
Thread threadMock = PowerMockito.mock(Thread.class);
Vector<URL> vec = new Vector<URL>();
Mockito.when(loader.getResources("measure")).thenReturn(vec.elements());
Mockito.when(threadMock.getContextClassLoader()).thenReturn(loader);
PowerMockito.mockStatic(Thread.class);
Mockito.when(Thread.currentThread()).thenReturn(threadMock);
...
}
}
While running this tests I got:
java.lang.LinkageError: loader constraint violation: loader (instance of org/powermock/core/classloader/MockClassLoader) previously initiated loading for a different type with name "javax/management/MBeanServer"
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:791)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:634)
at org.powermock.core.classloader.MockClassLoader.loadUnmockedClass(MockClassLoader.java:201)
at org.powermock.core.classloader.MockClassLoader.loadModifiedClass(MockClassLoader.java:149)
at org.powermock.core.classloader.DeferSupportingClassLoader.loadClass(DeferSupportingClassLoader.java:67)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:356)
at org.codecover.instrumentation.java.measurement.ProtocolImpl.initializeMBean(ProtocolImpl.java:247)
at org.codecover.instrumentation.java.measurement.ProtocolImpl.<init>(ProtocolImpl.java:237)
at org.codecover.instrumentation.java.measurement.ProtocolImpl.getInstance(ProtocolImpl.java:185)
at measure.CodeCoverCoverageCounter$6ya5ud0ow79ijrr1dvjrp4nxx60qhxeua02ta2fzpmb1d.<clinit>(MeasureCalculatorsHolder.java:146)
at measure.MeasureCalculatorsHolder.<clinit>(MeasureCalculatorsHolder.java:17)
at java.lang.Class.forName0(Native Method)
at java.lang.Class.forName(Class.java:188)
at javassist.runtime.Desc.getClassObject(Desc.java:43)
at javassist.runtime.Desc.getClassType(Desc.java:152)
at javassist.runtime.Desc.getType(Desc.java:122)
at javassist.runtime.Desc.getType(Desc.java:78)
at algorithm.AllMeasuresDataTest.testGetMeasures(AllMeasuresDataTest.java:26)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601)
at org.junit.internal.runners.TestMethod.invoke(TestMethod.java:66)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit44MethodRunner.runTestMethod(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:312)
at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie$2.run(MethodRoadie.java:86)
at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runBeforesThenTestThenAfters(MethodRoadie.java:94)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit44MethodRunner.executeTest(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:296)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit49RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit49MethodRunner.executeTestInSuper(PowerMockJUnit49RunnerDelegateImpl.java:116)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit49RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit49MethodRunner.executeTest(PowerMockJUnit49RunnerDelegateImpl.java:77)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$PowerMockJUnit44MethodRunner.runBeforesThenTestThenAfters(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:284)
at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.runTest(MethodRoadie.java:84)
at org.junit.internal.runners.MethodRoadie.run(MethodRoadie.java:49)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.invokeTestMethod(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:209)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.runMethods(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:148)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl$1.run(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:122)
at org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runUnprotected(ClassRoadie.java:34)
at org.junit.internal.runners.ClassRoadie.runProtected(ClassRoadie.java:44)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.internal.impl.PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.run(PowerMockJUnit44RunnerDelegateImpl.java:120)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.common.internal.impl.JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.run(JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.java:101)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.common.internal.impl.AbstractCommonPowerMockRunner.run(AbstractCommonPowerMockRunner.java:53)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.PowerMockRunner.run(PowerMockRunner.java:53)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run(JUnit4TestReference.java:50)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:38)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:467)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:683)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:390)
at org.codecover.juniteclipse.runner.EclipseTestRunner.main(EclipseTestRunner.java:40)
Do you know how can I prevent this? I maybe there is another way to mock such a piece of code:
ClassLoader classLoader = Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader();
...
Enumeration<URL> resources = classLoader.getResources(path);
Try adding this annotation to your Test class:
@PowerMockIgnore("javax.management.*")
Worked for me.
Classloader conflict, use this: @PowerMockIgnore("javax.management.*")
Let mock classloader do not load javax.*.
It works.
Similar to the accepted response here, I ended up having to exclude all of the SSL related classes:
@PowerMockIgnore({"javax.management.*", "org.apache.http.conn.ssl.*", "com.amazonaws.http.conn.ssl.*", "javax.net.ssl.*"})
Adding that to the top of my class resolved the error.
This may be a bit of an old topic, but I have also ran into this problem. Turns out that some of the java versions cannot handle powermockito when powermock finds out there are 2 classes with the same name in the same package (over different dependencies).
With any version higher than Java 7_25 it gives this error.
In order to mock system classes, prepare the class that is the target of the test, not Thread.class. There's no way PowerMock will be able to instrument Thread.class because it is required during JVM startup - well before PowerMock can instrument.
The way instrumentation works, once a class is loaded, it can no longer be intstrumented.
See the PowerMock wiki.
In PowerMock 1.7.0 a user-defined global configuration can be added to your project's classpath. PowerMockConfig
org/powermock/extensions/configuration.properties
Simply add a line in the properties file like:
powermock.global-ignore=javax.management.*
This will resolve the error for all the test classes in your project.
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/16520699/mockito-powermock-linkageerror-while-mocking-system-class