$.Deferred: How to detect when every promise has been executed

六眼飞鱼酱① 提交于 2019-11-26 09:00:50

More sophisticated promise libraries have an allSettled() function like Q or Promise.settle like Bluebird.

In jQuery, you could implement such a function yourself as well and extend the $ namespace with it, but that will only be necessary if you need it often and performance-optimized.

A simpler solution would be to create a new promise for each of the ones you are waiting for, and fulfilling them even when the underlying one is rejected. Then you can use $.when() on them without problems. In short:

// using Underscore's .invoke() method:
$.when.apply(null, _.invoke(promises, "then", null, $.when)).done(…)

More stable:

$.when.apply($, $.map(promises, function(p) {
    return p.then(null, function() {
        return $.Deferred().resolveWith(this, arguments);
    });
})).then(…);

You might change the then callbacks a bit to distinguish between fulfilled and rejected results in the final done.

Smithy,

First let's assume your promises are in an array.

var promises = [....];

What you appear to want is .when() applied to some transform of these promises, such that any rejected promise is converted to resolved, whilst being transparent to promises that are already resolved.

The required operation can be written very succinctly as follows :

$.when.apply(null, $.map(promises, resolvize)).done(...);
//or, if further filtering by .then() is required ...
$.when.apply(null, $.map(promises, resolvize)).then(...);

where resolvize is the transform mechanism.

So what should resolvize(), look like? Let's exploit the characteristics of .then() to make the distinction beteween a resolved and a rejected promise, and respond accordingly.

function resolvize(promise) {
    //Note: null allows a resolved promise to pass straight through unmolested;
    return promise.then(null, function() {
        return $.Deferred().resolve.apply(null, arguments).promise();
    });
}

untested

With resolvize in some outer scope, it can be made available to be used in a $.when.apply($.map(promises, resolvize)) expression wherever it is needed. This is most likely adequate, without going to the extent of extending jQuery with a new method.

Regardless of how the transform is achieved, you end up with a potential issue; namely knowing for each argument of the .done() callback, whether its corresponding promise was originally resolved or rejected. That's the price you pay for converting rejection to resolution. You may, however, be able to detect the original status from the parameter(s) with which the original promises were resolved/rejected.

That's an interesting property of always - I hadn't expected that behaviour.

I suppose you could use a master, top-level deferred to monitor the states of the main deferreds, which is resolved only once the main deferreds are all either resolved or rejected. Something like:

//set up master deferred, to observe the states of the sub-deferreds
var master_dfd = new $.Deferred;
master_dfd.done(function() { alert('done'); });

//set up sub-deferreds
var dfds = [new $.Deferred, new $.Deferred, new $.Deferred];
var cb = function() {
    if (dfds.filter(function(dfd) {
        return /resolved|rejected/.test(dfd.state());
    }).length == dfds.length)
        master_dfd.resolve();
};
dfds.forEach(function(dfd) { dfd.always(cb); });

//resolve or reject sub-deferreds. Master deferred resolves only once
//all are resolved or rejected
dfds[0].resolve();
dfds[1].reject();
dfds[2].resolve();

Fiddle: http://jsfiddle.net/Wtxfy/3/

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!