I have checked that in the web response the server is IIS when I deploy ASP.NET5 to azure web app, so I guess the IIS platform handler is used to redirect it to Kestrel. So I am wondering if it is possible to run directly on Kestrel, and what benefits/drawbacks will that have (probably regardless if it's in Azure or not). I suppose it will be a bit faster since IIS will be excluded from the pipline, but it should not be too much overhead I suppose...
On Azure Web App, you cannot bypass IIS.
But in the general case, you can definitely run Kestrel directly. It is after all just dnx web and it's exactly what the XPlat version (Linux, OSX) will end-up using (almost).
What you lose from not using IIS
- Security (newer component compared to IIS)
- Easy setup of SSL
- Kernel module that handle file/cache and other things (kernel = faster)
- Application monitoring/Keep-Alive (what happens if Kestrel crash)
- Multiple hostnames single-port (80) reuse
- etc.
What you gain from not using IIS
- Complete control over your process
- Higher overall performance
- Simpler installation/execution
What you should do if you choose not to use IIS
If you are OK with the "lose" points, I would still go and host your Kestrel behind a reverse proxy or an NGINX server. Kestrel was made to be "production ready" but it's not NGINX or IIS.
It will not keep itself alive as far as I know.
If I missed anything, please let me know.
Your question is a bit ambiguous, as it asks at the same time about Azure Web Apps and about the general case. @Maxime answered the general part, so I'll answer the Azure Web App part.
It is not possible to bypass IIS in Azure Web Apps. Stack that normally run without IIS are typically handled using HttpPlatformHandler (as is the case for ASP.NET 5), or in the case of Node some variant of that (iisnode).
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/34312569/is-it-possible-to-run-asp-net-5-site-directly-on-kestrel-in-azure-webapps