I have a query like this that nicely generates a series of dates between 2 given dates:
select date '2004-03-07' + j - i as AllDate
from generate_series(0, extract(doy from date '2004-03-07')::int - 1) as i,
generate_series(0, extract(doy from date '2004-08-16')::int - 1) as j
It generates 162 dates between 2004-03-07
and 2004-08-16
and this what I want. The problem with this code is that it wouldn't give the right answer when the two dates are from different years, for example when I try 2007-02-01
and 2008-04-01
.
Is there a better solution?
Can be done without conversion to/from int (but to/from timestamp instead)
SELECT date_trunc('day', dd):: date
FROM generate_series
( '2007-02-01'::timestamp
, '2008-04-01'::timestamp
, '1 day'::interval) dd
;
This should be the optimal way:
SELECT day::date
FROM generate_series(timestamp '2004-03-07'
, timestamp '2004-08-16'
, interval '1 day') AS t(day);
Additional
date_trunc()
is not needed. The cast todate
(day::date
) does that implicitly.But there is also no point in casting date literals to
date
as input parameter. Au contraire,timestamp
is the best choice. The advantage in performance is small, but there is no reason not to take it. And you do not needlessly involve DST (daylight saving time) rules coupled with the conversion fromdate
totimestamp with time zone
and back. See below.
Equivalent short syntax:
SELECT day::date
FROM generate_series(timestamp '2004-03-07', '2004-08-16', '1 day') day;
Or with the set-returning function in the SELECT
list:
SELECT generate_series(timestamp '2004-03-07', '2004-08-16', '1 day')::date AS day;
The AS
keyword is required in the last variant, Postgres would misinterpret the column alias day
otherwise. And I would not advise that variant before Postgres 10 - at least not with more than one set-returning function in the same SELECT
list:
Why?
There are a number of overloaded variants of generate_series()
. Currently (Postgres 11):
SELECT oid::regprocedure AS function_signature , prorettype::regtype AS return_type FROM pg_proc where proname = 'generate_series';
function_signature | return_type :-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | :-------------------------- generate_series(integer,integer,integer) | integer generate_series(integer,integer) | integer generate_series(bigint,bigint,bigint) | bigint generate_series(bigint,bigint) | bigint generate_series(numeric,numeric,numeric) | numeric generate_series(numeric,numeric) | numeric generate_series(timestamp without time zone,timestamp without time zone,interval) | timestamp without time zone generate_series(timestamp with time zone,timestamp with time zone,interval) | timestamp with time zone
(The numeric
variants were added with Postgres 9.5.) The relevant ones are the last two in bold taking and returning timestamp
/ timestamptz
.
As you can see, there is no variant taking or returning date
. An explicit cast is needed to return date
. Passing timestamp
resolves to the best variant directly without descending into function type resolution rules and without additional cast for the input.
timestamp '2004-03-07'
is perfectly valid, btw. The omitted time part defaults to 00:00
with ISO format.
Thanks to function type resolution we can still pass date
. But that requires more work from Postgres. There is an implicit cast from date
to timestamp
as well as one from date
to timestamptz
. Would be ambiguous, but timestamptz
is "preferred" among "Date/time types". So the match is decided at step 4d.:
Run through all candidates and keep those that accept preferred types (of the input data type's type category) at the most positions where type conversion will be required. Keep all candidates if none accept preferred types. If only one candidate remains, use it; else continue to the next step.
In addition to the extra work in function type resolution this adds an extra cast to timestamptz
. The cast to timestamptz
not only adds more cost, it can also introduce problems with DST leading to unexpected results in rare cases. (DST is a moronic concept, btw, can't stress this enough.) Related:
I added demos to the fiddle showing the more expensive query plan:
dbfiddle here
Related:
You can generate series directly with dates. No need to use ints or timestamps:
select date::date
from generate_series(
'2004-03-07'::date,
'2004-08-16'::date,
'1 day'::interval
) date;
you can use like
select generate_series ( '2012-12-31'::timestamp , '2018-10-31'::timestamp , '1 day'::interval) :: date
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14113469/generating-time-series-between-two-dates-in-postgresql