Is it normal to use LocalDb in production?

这一生的挚爱 提交于 2019-11-28 18:39:30

LocalDB is absolutely supported in production. From the performance point of view it is identical to SQL Server Express, as they share the same database engine.

Now, for a site running in full IIS I would recommend using service-based instance of SQL Server Express. Since IIS is running as a service it is best to have a service-hosted database as well. That means you should not be using User Instance=true or AttachDbFileName=... in your connection string.

If you want to learn more, I recommend this post on using LocalDB from full IIS, part 1 and its follow up, part 2. They go into more details.

"Normal" - hard to say, that's a relative term.

Permitted - yes. Here is a quote from the Microsoft SQL Server Express blog where LocalDB was introduced:

"...if the simplicity (and limitations) of LocalDB fit the needs of the target application environment, developers can continue using it in production, as LocalDB makes a pretty good embedded database too."


UPDATE (March 2019)

After using LocalDB in dozens of production sites for two solid years now, I'll confirm that it works. However, if you need a free multi-user ("shared" in LocalDB terminology) DB, use SQL Server Express instead. LocalDB is not a good multi-user solution. There are MANY obstacles to overcome. I don't have time now, but if you would like details on those obstacles and respective workarounds, leave a comment, and I'll document them here or in another question.

I don't think so,

Even though LocalDb and SQLExpress might be the same on performance, LocalDb's Process shuts down itself if it doesn't have any request for a while. And usually the next request takes too long to response (or even worse, it times out).

I would recommend you install your own instance of SQLEXPRESS.

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!