Proper way to Mock repository objects for unit tests using Moq and Unity

£可爱£侵袭症+ 提交于 2019-11-28 15:48:26
Mark Seemann

Unit tests should not use the container at all. Dependency Injection (DI) comes in two phases:

  1. Use DI patterns to inject dependencies into consumers. You don't need a container to do that.
  2. At the application's Composition Root, use a DI Container (or Poor Man's DI) to wire all components together.

How not to use any DI Container at all for unit testing

As an example, consider a class that uses IRepository1. By using the Constructor Injection pattern, we can make the dependency an invariant of the class.

public class SomeClass
{
    private readonly IRepository1 repository;

    public SomeClass(IRepository1 repository)
    {
        if (repository == null)
        {
            throw new ArgumentNullException("repository");
        }

        this.repository = repository;
    }

    // More members...
}

Notice that the readonly keyword combined with the Guard Clause guarantees that the repository field isn't null if the instance was successfully instantiated.

You don't need a container to create a new instance of MyClass. You can do that directly from a unit test using Moq or another Test Double:

[TestMethod]
public void Test6()
{
    var repStub = new Mock<IRepository1>();
    var sut = new SomeClass(repStub.Object);
    // The rest of the test...
}

See here for more information...

How to use Unity for unit testing

However, if you absolutely must use Unity in your tests, you can create the container and use the RegisterInstance method:

[TestMethod]
public void Test7()
{
    var repMock = new Mock<IRepository1>();

    var container = new UnityContainer();
    container.RegisterInstance<IRepository1>(repMock.Object);

    var sut = container.Resolve<SomeClass>();
    // The rest of the test...
}
易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!