Prolog separating into two lists issue

拈花ヽ惹草 提交于 2019-11-28 14:46:30

When the first two elements are different you do not need a recursive goal.

grab([], [], []).
grab([A,A|Rest], [A|As], L2):- !, grab([A|Rest], As, L2).
grab([A|Tail], [A], Tail).
false
grab(Xs, Ys, Zs) :-
   eqprefix(Xs, Ys, Zs).

eqprefix([],[],[]).
eqprefix([X],[],[X]).
eqprefix([X,Y|Xs], [], [X,Y|Xs]) :-
    dif(X,Y).
eqprefix([X,X|Xs], [X|Ys], Zs) :-
   eqprefix2([X|Xs], Ys, Zs).

eqprefix2([X], [X], []).
eqprefix2([X,Y|Xs], [X], [Y|Xs]) :-
    dif(X,Y).
eqprefix2([X,X|Xs], [X|Ys], Zs) :-
    eqprefix2([X|Xs], Ys, Zs).

?- eqprefix([a,a,a,b,c],Ys,Zs).
Ys = [a, a, a],
Zs = [b, c] ;
false.

?- eqprefix(Xs,[a,a,a],[b,c]).
Xs = [a, a, a, b, c] ;
false.

?- eqprefix([A,B,C,D,E],[a|Ys],[b,c]).
A = B, B = C, C = a,
D = b,
E = c,
Ys = [a, a] ;
false.

In the definition you gave, you get many different answers:

?- grab([a,a,a,b,c],Ys,Zs).
  Ys = [a, a], Zs = [a, b, c]
; Ys = [a],    Zs = [a, a, b, c]
; Ys = [a],    Zs = [a, a, b, c]
; Ys = [],     Zs = [a, a, a, b, c].
false

Here is a solution using s. Most interesting is here the usage of a non-terminal that is not context-free. I will start with an attempt that is too general:

grab_tentative(Xs, Ys, Zs) :-
   phrase((seq(Ys),seq(Zs)), Xs).

seq([]) --> [].
seq([E|Es]) --> [E], seq(Es).

grab_tentative/3 ensures that Xs consists of Ys concatenated with Zs. That is way too general, but all intended solutions are already included.

?- Xs = [A,B,C], grab_tentative(Xs,Ys,Zs).
   Xs = Zs, Zs = [A, B, C], Ys = []
;  Xs = [A, B, C], Ys = [A], Zs = [B, C]
;  Xs = [A, B, C], Ys = [A, B], Zs = [C]
;  Xs = Ys, Ys = [A, B, C], Zs = []
;  false.

The first answer says that Ys = [], but (as has been clarified by @Sarah), Ys should always be a non-empty list, so we can restrict the answers to non-empty lists:

grab_tentative(Xs, Ys, Zs) :-
   Ys = [_|_],
   phrase((seq(Ys),seq(Zs)), Xs).

The answers Xs = [A, B, C], Ys = [A, B], Zs = [C] and Xs = Ys, Ys = [A, B, C], Zs = [] both permit that A and B are different. So we have to add that they are the same:

grab_tentative(Xs, Ys, Zs) :-
   Ys = [A|_],
   phrase((all_seq(=(A),Ys),seq(Zs)), Xs).

all_seq(_, []) --> [].
all_seq(C_1, [C|Cs]) -->
   [C],
   {call(C_1,C)},
   all_seq(C_1, Cs).

Now, the answers are already a bit better:

?- Xs = [A,B,C], grab_tentative(Xs,Ys,Zs).
   Xs = [A, B, C], Ys = [A], Zs = [B, C]
;  Xs = [B, B, C], A = B, Ys = [B, B], Zs = [C]
;  Xs = Ys, Ys = [C, C, C], A = B, B = C, Zs = []
;  false.

The first answer includes that A = B. So, it really should contain dif(A,B). To do so we need to introduce such a context. Here is way to do this. Note that or_end//1 is like []//0, except that it ensures some extra condition.

grab_final(Xs, Ys, Zs) :-
   Ys = [A|_],
   phrase((all_seq(=(A),Ys), or_end(dif(A)), seq(Zs)), Xs).

or_end(C_1) -->
  call(cond_or_end(C_1)). % interface to predicates

cond_or_end(_C_1, [], []).
cond_or_end(C_1, [E|Es], [E|Es]) :-

Now, the answers are as expected:

?- Xs = [A,B,C], grab_final(Xs, Ys, Zs).
   Xs = [A, B, C], Ys = [A], Zs = [B, C], dif(A, B)
;  Xs = [B, B, C], A = B, Ys = [B, B], Zs = [C], dif(B, C)
;  Xs = Ys, Ys = [C, C, C], A = B, B = C, Zs = []
;  false.
false

Here is another solution that takes into account what @Sarah wrote. Given this use, grab/3 should never succeed for an empty list for the first or second argument.

grab([A], [A], []).
grab([A,B|Bs], [A], [B|Bs]) :-
   dif(A,B).
grab([A,A|Xs], [A|As], Bs) :-
   grab([A|Xs], As, Bs).

?- Xs = [A,B], grab(Xs,Ys,Zs).
  Xs = [A, B], Ys = [A],    Zs = [B], dif(A, B)
; Xs = Ys,     Ys = [B, B], Zs = [],  A = B
; false.
易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!