问题
This is a follow up of a question noted here
Lets says our implemented server v1 and v2 response looks as follows
v1Response = { id: "1", name: "awesome" }
v2Response = { id: "2", name: "awesome", value: "karate" }
Similarly we define the client schema for v1 and v2 like as follows
v1Schema = { id: "#string", name: "#string }
v2Schema = { id: "#string", name: "#string, value: "#string" }
We implement schema validation in our generic scenario as follows. We can easily set the "response" with either v1Response/v2Response AND "schema" with either v1Schema/v2Schema depending on our the environment.
* match response == schema
Above generic script works perfectly fine as long as we are testing v1 server against v1 client / v2 server against v2 client. However we cannot re-use the same scenario when we want to test backward compatibility for example v2 server against v1 client. In this case
* match response (actually v2Response) == schema (actually v1Schema) <--- will fail
So in order to make it work and do backward compatibility testing, I also wanted to use karate "contains" feature like
* match response (actually v2Response) contains schema (actually v1Schema) <--- will pass
However in the quest to keep my scenarios generic it is currently not possible to do either
- Use both ==/contains in the same line of script like as follows
- serverVersion == clientVersion ? (match response == schema) : (match response contains schema)
OR
Using some flag as follows
- match response SOMEFLAG schema
whereas SOMEFLAG can be set to either "==" or "contains" in karate-config.js depending on environment we are testing.
EDIT
From the above example, all I want is to test following cases that should pass
* match v1Response == v1Schema
* match v2Response == v2Schema
* match v2Response contains v1Schema
using a generic line as following
* match response == schema <--- can it possibly be solved using above suggested solutions ?
回答1:
For some reason you feel that hacking the match
clause is the only way to solve this problem. Please keep an open mind and, here you go:
* def schemas =
"""
{
v1: { id: "#string", name: "#string" },
v2: { id: "#string", name: "#string", value: "#string" }
}
"""
* def env = 'v1'
* def response = { id: "1", name: "awesome" }
* match response == schemas[env]
* def env = 'v2'
* def response = { id: "2", name: "awesome", value: "karate" }
* match response == schemas[env]
* def response = { id: "1", name: "awesome" }
* match response == karate.filterKeys(schemas[env], response)
The last line is as generic as you can get.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57205643/cannot-use-and-contains-in-same-line-of-scenario-using-conditional-logic