I'm in my app folder, but the command rails s
is not working. I read through quite a few posts on Stack Overflow, and most of them seem to be from users who are not in their app directory.
In addition, I built a few other apps. I checked those, and the Rails server works for all of those apps. This is the only one where I can't get it to launch.
Output of which rails
:
/Users/jmcrist/.rvm/gems/ruby-2.0.0-p247/bin/rails
Output of rails s
:
MacBook-Pro:first_app jmcrist$ rails s
Usage:
rails new APP_PATH [options]
Options:
-r, [--ruby=PATH] # Path to the Ruby binary of your choice
# Default: /Users/jmcrist/.rvm/rubies/ruby-2.0.0-p247/bin/ruby
-b, [--builder=BUILDER] # Path to a application builder (can be a filesystem path or URL)
-m, [--template=TEMPLATE] # Path to an application template (can be a filesystem path or URL)
[--skip-gemfile] # Don't create a Gemfile
[--skip-bundle] # Don't run bundle install
-G, [--skip-git] # Skip Git ignores and keeps
-O, [--skip-active-record] # Skip Active Record files
-S, [--skip-sprockets] # Skip Sprockets files
-d, [--database=DATABASE] # Preconfigure for selected database (options: mysql/oracle/postgresql/sqlite3/frontbase/ibm_db/sqlserver/jdbcmysql/jdbcsqlite3/jdbcpostgresql/jdbc)
# Default: sqlite3
-j, [--javascript=JAVASCRIPT] # Preconfigure for selected JavaScript library
# Default: jquery
-J, [--skip-javascript] # Skip JavaScript files
[--dev] # Setup the application with Gemfile pointing to your Rails checkout
[--edge] # Setup the application with Gemfile pointing to Rails repository
-T, [--skip-test-unit] # Skip Test::Unit files
[--old-style-hash] # Force using old style hash (:foo => 'bar') on Ruby >= 1.9
Runtime options:
-f, [--force] # Overwrite files that already exist
-p, [--pretend] # Run but do not make any changes
-q, [--quiet] # Suppress status output
-s, [--skip] # Skip files that already exist
Rails options:
-h, [--help] # Show this help message and quit
-v, [--version] # Show Rails version number and quit
Description:
The 'rails new' command creates a new Rails application with a default
directory structure and configuration at the path you specify.
You can specify extra command-line arguments to be used every time
'rails new' runs in the .railsrc configuration file in your home directory.
Note that the arguments specified in the .railsrc file don't affect the
defaults values shown above in this help message.
Example:
rails new ~/Code/Ruby/weblog
This generates a skeletal Rails installation in ~/Code/Ruby/weblog.
See the README in the newly created application to get going.
I'm working through Hartl's Rails Tutorial, and he makes quite a few modifications to the gemfile. I am wondering if this might be the cause?
source 'https://rubygems.org'
gem 'rails', '3.2.13'
group :development do
gem 'sqlite3', '1.3.5'
end
# Gems used only for assets and not required
# in production environments by default.
group :assets do
gem 'sass-rails', '3.2.5'
gem 'coffee-rails', '3.2.2'
gem 'uglifier', '1.2.3'
end
gem 'jquery-rails', '2.0.2'
group :production do
gem 'pg', '0.12.2'
end
It seems to think you are not in a rails directory (your output is saying the only valid way to use rails is with rails new
).
Depending on your version, Rails identifies this differently. On 3.2, it checks for a file at script/rails
. Now that 4.0 has been released, it looks for either script/rails
or bin/rails
(https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/207fa5c11ddf1cfd696f0eeb07d6466aae9d451e/railties/lib/rails/app_rails_loader.rb#L6)
Presumably you can get around this by creating the file rails
in your script
directory (if you do not have a script
directory, create one in the root of your app):
#!/usr/bin/env ruby
# This command will automatically be run when you run "rails" with Rails 3 gems installed from the root of your application.
APP_PATH = File.expand_path('../../config/application', __FILE__)
require File.expand_path('../../config/boot', __FILE__)
require 'rails/commands'
Of course, it's worth wondering why you don't have this file in the first place. Might be worth making sure your rails is the version you want to be using first (rails -v
if the version is newer, this post will show you how to create the new app using the older version).
Possible reasons:
- you are not in a directory that contains a full rails app
- your
bin
directory might me empty, try to runrake rails:update:bin
(for Rails 4) orrails app:update:bin
(Rails 5)
All the above answers didn't help me. What solved my problem for Rails 4
was to run command in the root directory of my application:
rake rails:update:bin
After that running rails s
was running as expected.
You likely have not bundled your gems yet:
# from command line
bundle install
If you use rvm
or rbenv
for instance to keep multiple ruby versions, maybe your default rails
version for that specific ruby
version is different than the project you are trying to run and therefore it's not being able to detect your application.
To make sure you are using the right rails
version you can compare both results. This is what I've got:
$ rails -v
Rails 3.1.0
to
$ bundle exec rails -v
Rails 5.0.0.1
In this case, you can keep the default rails
version and then use:
$ bundle exec rails server
Or install the specific rails gem
to that very ruby
version with:
$ gem install rails -v 5.0.0.1
$ rails -v
Rails 5.0.0.1
And then get it working with the less verbose command:
$ rails s
I hope this becomes helpful to other folks in the same situation!
I had this problem, took me a few minutes to realize I'd forgotten to change active Ruby version with chruby. Different Ruby implied a different Rails version, which looked for the relevant file in another folder.
First check with your location path and then
bundle install
If still does not work, enter
/bin/bash --login
bundle install
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/17645041/why-doesnt-rails-s-work-from-the-app-directory