Allocated array already zeroed

非 Y 不嫁゛ 提交于 2021-01-27 06:47:01

问题


In C++11 when I allocate a dynamic array using T *array = new T[n]; it's already zeroed (using gcc 4.7.2, Ubuntu 12.10 64bit).

  1. Is this forced by the C++11 specification?
  2. How can one allocate an array without zeroing its items? This should be probably a little bit faster.

Edit: I've checked that for T = int.

gcc cxx-flags: -std=gnu++11 -O3 -ffast-math -fno-rtti


回答1:


§ 5.3.4

If the new-initializer is omitted, the object is default-initialized (8.5); if no initialization is performed, the object has indeterminate value.

new-initializer is the () in new T[] (), which you have omitted.

§ 8.5 / 6

To default-initialize an object of type T means:

— if T is a (possibly cv-qualified) class type (Clause 9), the default constructor for T is called (and the initialization is ill-formed if T has no accessible default constructor);

— if T is an array type, each element is default-initialized;

— otherwise, no initialization is performed.

int[] is default initialized -> each element is default-initialized.

"Is this forced by the C++11 specification?": "no initialization is performed", so no, zeroing is not forced if T has no zeroing constructor (i.e. T is a POD). For T=int, no zeroing has to be performed.

Why is it zero anyway? If your program allocates new memory from the operating system, the OS zeroes the new memory for you. It would be very dangerous, if you could read memory of another program, which possibly stores sensible data. However, if you write into that memory, free it and allocate some of it again, it should not be zeroed.




回答2:


It will not be initialized (still calling the constructor if T is a class, of course). To force value-initialization (which is a name that to newbies can be misleading - let's call it zero-initialization which it is for primitive types like int), do

new T[N]()

That is, just put a pair of parenthesis.




回答3:


Depends on your actual type T. It might be initialized with zeros under certain conditions. See here: Default initialization in C++




回答4:


Even if you can use a C++ feature to dynamically allocate uninitialized memory (std::get_temporary_buffer?), the underlying implementation of malloc() and ::new in your OS's libc is to use an anonymous mmap() for large allocation blocks (where large is a tunable). And anonymous mmap() are always zero initialized.



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/13593165/allocated-array-already-zeroed

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!