Does dereferencing a pointer make a copy of it?

こ雲淡風輕ζ 提交于 2019-11-27 21:02:07

In this case the value at the pointer is copied (though this is not necessarily the case as the optimiser may optimise it out).

int val = *pPtr;

In this case however no copy will take place:

int& rVal = *pPtr;

The reason no copy takes place is because a reference is not a machine code level construct. It is a higher level construct and thus is something the compiler uses internally rather than generating specific code for it.

The same, obviously, goes for function parameters.

In the simple case, no. There are more complicated cases, though:

void foo(float const& arg);
int * p = new int(7);
foo(*p);

Here, a temporary object is created, because the type of the dereferenced pointer (int) does not match the base type of the function parameter (float). A conversion sequence exists, and the converted temporary can be bound to arg since that's a const reference.

Hopefully it does not : it would if the called function takes its argument by value.

Furthermore, that's the expected behavior of a reference :

void inc(int &i) { ++i; }

int main()
{
    int i = 0;
    int *j = &i;
    inc(*j);
    std::cout << i << std::endl;
}

This code is expected to print 1 because inc takes its argument by reference. Had a copy been made upon inc call, the code would print 0.

No. A reference is more or less just like a pointer with different notation and the restriction that there is no null reference. But like a pointer it contains just the address of an object.

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!