Why has a lambda with no capture changed from a static in C# 5 to an instance method in C# 6?

与世无争的帅哥 提交于 2019-11-27 20:39:37

问题


This code throws an exception on the marked line:

using System;
using System.Linq.Expressions;

namespace ConsoleApplication2
{
    class Program
    {
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            Action<int, int> a = (x, y) => Console.WriteLine(x + y);

            ParameterExpression p1 = Expression.Parameter(typeof(int), "p1");
            ParameterExpression p2 = Expression.Parameter(typeof(int), "p2");

            // Here is the exception ArgumentNullException.
            MethodCallExpression call = Expression.Call(a.Method, p1, p2);
        }
    }
}

Now, I've tested this code in VS2013 (works like a charm) and in VS2015 Community (throws the exception).

I followed the .Net Reference Source, which led me to some code condition which checkes whether the supplied method IsStatic or not.

In my case, the method I pass (a.Method) is static in VS2013 and for some reason non static (instance) in VS2015. If not, it throws, telling me that I did not supply the Instance argument.

Why is it so? How can this be avoided so that Expression.Call would begin to work again in new Visual Studio?


回答1:


I don't have an answer as to why that is so (reproduced locally, too).

However, the answer to:

Why is it so? How can this be avoided so that Expression.Call would begin to work again in new Visual Studio?

You can do this (works on both compilers):

Action<int, int> a = (x, y) => Console.WriteLine(x + y);

ParameterExpression p1 = Expression.Parameter(typeof(int), "p1");
ParameterExpression p2 = Expression.Parameter(typeof(int), "p2");

MethodCallExpression call;
if (a.Method.IsStatic)
{
    call = Expression.Call(a.Method, p1, p2);
}
else
{
    call = Expression.Call(Expression.Constant(a.Target), a.Method, p1, p2);
}

Thanks to Jeppe Stig Nielsen for fix regarding a.Target




回答2:


Roslyn (the C# compiler used by VS 2015) changed all lambda methods to non-static methods, whether they capture variables or not. See Delegate caching behavior changes in Roslyn. As I explain, this is an allowed behavior because anonymous methods (like those at issue here) that don't capture variables have fewer lifetime requirements than those that do. This doesn't mean, though, that those methods must be static: this is merely an implementation detail.




回答3:


Why is it so?

I don't know why, and honestly was unaware of that change, but taking a quick look at the decompiled code showed that for all similar lambdas inside the class Roslyn generates instance methods in a singleton nested class called <>c like this

internal class Program
{
    [CompilerGenerated]
    [Serializable]
    private sealed class <>c
    {
        public static readonly Program.<>c <>9;
        public static Action<int, int> <>9__0_0;

        static <>c()
        {
            Program.<>c.<>9 = new Program.<>c();
        }

        internal void <Main>b__0_0(int x, int y)
        {
            Console.WriteLine(x + y);
        }
    }
}

To me this is a breaking change, but I didn't find any information about that.

What about how to make your code working, I think @Rob answer covers that part.



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33948144/why-has-a-lambda-with-no-capture-changed-from-a-static-in-c-sharp-5-to-an-instan

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!