问题
When "deconstructing" a tuple, I can use _
to denote tuple elements I'm not interested in, e.g.
>>> a,_,_ = (1,2,3)
>>> a
1
Using Python 2.x, how can I express the same with function arguments? I tried to use underscores:
>>> def f(a,_,_): return a
...
File "<stdin>", line 1
SyntaxError: duplicate argument '_' in function definition
I also tried to just omit the argument altogether:
>>> def f(a,,): return a
File "<stdin>", line 1
def f(a,,): return a
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
Is there another way to achieve the same?
回答1:
Here's what I do with unused arguments:
def f(a, *unused):
return a
回答2:
A funny way I just thought of is to delete the variable:
def f(foo, unused1, unused2, unused3):
del unused1, unused2, unused3
return foo
This has numerous advantages:
- The unused variable can still be used when calling the function both as a positional argument and as a keyword argument.
- If you start to use it later, you can't since it's deleted, so there is less risk of mistakes.
- It's standard python syntax.
- PyCharm does the right thing!
- PyLint won't complain and using
del
is the solution recommended in the PyLint manual.
回答3:
The underscore is used for things we don't care about and the * in *args denotes a list of arguments. Therefore, we can use *_ to denote a list of things we don't care about:
def foo(bar, *_):
return bar
It even passes PyCharm's checks.
回答4:
You can use '_' as prefix, so that pylint will ignore these parameters:
def f(a, _b, _c):
回答5:
If you have both args and keyword arg you should use
def f(a, *args, **kwargs):
return a
回答6:
I think the accepted answer is bad, but it can still work, if you use what I should call "Perl way" of dealing with arguments (I don't know Perl really, but I quit trying to learn it after seeing the sub
syntax, with manual argument unpacking):
Your function has 3 arguments - this is what it gets called with (Duck typing, remember?). So you get:
def funfun(a, b, c):
return b * 2
2 unused parameters. But now, enter improved larsmans' approach:
def funfun(*args):
return args[1] * 2
And there go the warnings...
However, I still enjoy more the boxed's way:
def funfun(a, b, c):
del a, c
return b * 2
It keeps the self-documenting quality of parameter names. They're a feature, not a bug.
But, the language itself doesn't force you there - you could also go the other way around, and just let all your function have the signature (*args, **kwargs)
, and do the argument parsing manually every time. Imagine the level of control that gives you. And no more exceptions when being called in a deprecated way after changing your "signature" (argument count and meaning). This is something worth considering ;)
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10025680/how-can-i-denote-unused-function-arguments