Swift Combine alternative to Rx Observable.create

问题

I have some code that is built using RxSwift, and I'm playing around with converting it to use Apple's Combine framework.

One pattern which is very common is the use of Observable.create for one-shot observables (usually network requests). Something like this:

func loadWidgets() -> Observable<[Widget]> {
  return Observable.create { observer in
    // start the request when someone subscribes
    let loadTask = WidgetLoader.request("allWidgets", completion: { widgets in
      // publish result on success
      observer.onNext(widgets)
      observer.onComplete()
    }, error: { error in
      // publish error on failure
      observer.onError()
    })
    // allow cancellation
    return Disposable {
      loadTask.cancel()
    }
  }
}

I'm trying to map that across to Combine and I haven't been able to quite figure it out. The closest I've been able to get is using Future for something like this:

func loadWidgets() -> AnyPublisher<[Widget], Error> {
  return Future<[Widget], Error> { resolve in
    // start the request when someone subscribes
    let loadTask = WidgetLoader.request("allWidgets", completion: { widgets in
      // publish result on success
      resolve(.success(widgets))
    }, error: { error in
      // publish error on failure
      resolve(.failure(error))
    })
    // allow cancellation ???
  }
}

As you can see, it does most of it, but there's no ability to cancel. Secondarily, future doesn't allow multiple results.

Is there any way to do something like the Rx Observable.create pattern which allows cancellation and optionally multiple results?

回答1:

I think I found a way to mimic Observable.create using a PassthroughSubject in Combine. Here is the helper I made:

struct AnyObserver<Output, Failure: Error> {
    let onNext: ((Output) -> Void)
    let onError: ((Failure) -> Void)
    let onComplete: (() -> Void)
}

struct Disposable {
    let dispose: () -> Void
}

extension AnyPublisher {
    static func create(subscribe: @escaping (AnyObserver<Output, Failure>) -> Disposable) -> Self {
        let subject = PassthroughSubject<Output, Failure>()
        var disposable: Disposable?
        return subject
            .handleEvents(receiveSubscription: { subscription in
                disposable = subscribe(AnyObserver(
                    onNext: { output in subject.send(output) },
                    onError: { failure in subject.send(completion: .failure(failure)) },
                    onComplete: { subject.send(completion: .finished) }
                ))
            }, receiveCancel: { disposable?.dispose() })
            .eraseToAnyPublisher()
    }
}

And here is how it looks in usage:

func loadWidgets() -> AnyPublisher<[Widget], Error> {
    AnyPublisher.create { observer in
        let loadTask = WidgetLoader.request("allWidgets", completion: { widgets in
          observer.onNext(widgets)
          observer.onComplete()
        }, error: { error in
          observer.onError(error)
        })
        return Disposable {
          loadTask.cancel()
        }
    }
}

回答2:

From what I've learned, the support for initializing an AnyPublisher with a closure has been dropped in Xcode 11 beta 3. This would be a corresponding solution for Rx's Observable.create in this case, but for now I believe that the Future is a goto solution if you only need to propagate single value. In other cases I would go for returning a PassthroughSubject and propagating multiple values this way, but it will not allow you to start a task when the observation starts and I believe it's far from ideal compared to Observable.create.

In terms of cancellation, it does not have an isDisposed property similar to a Disposable, so it's not possible to directly check the state of it and stop your own tasks from executing. The only way that I can think of right now would be to observe for a cancel event, but it's surely not as comfortable as a Disposable. Also, I'd assume that cancel might in fact stop tasks like network requests from URLSession based on the docs here: https://developer.apple.com/documentation/combine/cancellable

回答3:

Add an isCancelled operation outside the closure and check it in the future's closure. isCancelled can be toggled with the handleEvent() operator.

    var isCancelled = false
    func loadWidgets() -> AnyPublisher<[Widget], Error> {
    return HandleEvents<Future<Any, Error>> { resolve in
        // start the request when someone subscribes
        let loadTask = WidgetLoader.request("allWidgets", completion: { widgets in
            // publish result on success
            resolve(.success(widgets))
        }, error: { error in
            // publish error on failure
            resolve(.failure(error))   
        }
        if isCancelled {
            loadTask.cancel()
        }  
        ).handleEvents(receiveCancel: {
        isCancelled = true
        })
    }
}

and somewhere in the app you do this to cancel the event

loadWidgets().cancel()

Also check this article

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58383895/swift-combine-alternative-to-rx-observable-create