Many to many relationship with junction table in Entity Framework?

坚强是说给别人听的谎言 提交于 2019-11-27 15:12:47

Once you model a junction table as an entity you indeed lose direct many-to-many relation between Consultant and Program. That is how it works. You will either have direct many-to-many relation or additional properties in the junction table. Not both. If you want both you can try creating custom Programs property on Consultant and use linq query to get related programs:

public IEnumerable<Program> Programs
{
    get
    {
        return this.ConsultantProgramLinks.Select(l => l.Program);   
    }
}

The example is also the explanation of your last problem. You can't have Program property on ConsultantProgramLink because it is a collection of related entities, not single entity (it should be called ConsultantProgramLinks). The property in ConsultantProgramLink entity is called simply Programbecause it represents single entity not collection.

Edit:

If you need each Program to be automatically associated with each Consultant you must enforce it when you are going to create new Program. Having junction table exposed as separate entity will probably allow you achieving it easily:

var program = new Program();
...
context.Programs.AddObject(program);

var ids = from c in context.Consultants
          select c.Id;

foreach (var id in ids)
{
    var link = new ConsultantProgramLink
        {
            ConsultantId = id,
            Program = program
        };
    context.ConsultantProgramLinks.AddObject(link);
}

context.SaveChanges();

If you add new Consultant you will have to create links to all programs in the same way.

The disadvantage is that if you have for example 1000 consultants this construct will create 1001 database inserts where each insert will be executed in separate roundtrip to the database. To avoid it the only option is either use stored procedur or trigger on Program table.

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!