What is the lifetime and validity of C++ iterators?

核能气质少年 提交于 2019-11-27 14:58:27

问题


I'm planning to implement a list of Things in C++ where elements might be removed out of order. I don't expect that i'll need any kind of random access (i just need to sweep the list periodically), and the order of items isn't important either.

So I thought of std::list<Thing*> with this->position = insert(lst.end(), thing) should do the trick. I'd like the Thing class to remember the position of each instance so that i can later easily do lst.erase(this->position) in constant time.

However, i'm still a bit new to C++ STL containers, and i don't know if it's safe to keep iterators for such a long time. Especially, given that there will be other elements deleted ahead and after the inserted Thing before it's gone.


回答1:


In list all iterators remain valid during inserting and only iterators to erased elements get invalid during erasing.

In your case keeping iterator should be fine even when other elements deleted ahead and after the inserted Thing*.

EDIT:

Additional details for vector and deque:

Vector:

  • inserting --- All iterators get invalid if reallocation happens, otherwise its valid.
  • erasing ---- All iterators after erase point get invalid.

deque:

  • inserting --- All iterators get invalid.
  • erasing ---- All iterators get invalid.



回答2:


This depends on the container you use.

Check: http://www.sgi.com/tech/stl/
Look at each containers documentation at the end their will be a description on the conditions that iterators stay valid under.

For std::list<> they remain valid under all conditions until the element they actually refer to is removed from the container (at this point they are invalid).



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/759274/what-is-the-lifetime-and-validity-of-c-iterators

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!