问题
Is there a way to calculate a formula stored in a string in JavaScript without using eval?
Normally I would do something like
var apa = \"12/5*9+9.4*2\";
alert(eval(apa));
So, does anyone know about alternatives to eval?
回答1:
This exactly the place where you should be using eval, or you will have to loop through the string and generate the numbers. You will have to use isNaN method to do it.
回答2:
Mhh, you could use the Function-constructor:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Function
function evil(fn) {
return new Function('return ' + fn)();
}
console.log( evil('12/5*9+9.4*2') ); // => 40.4
回答3:
There's nothing wrong with eval, especially for cases like this. You can sanitize the string with a regex first to be safe:
// strip anything other than digits, (), -+/* and .
var str = "12/5*9+9.4*2".replace(/[^-()\d/*+.]/g, '');
alert(eval(str));
回答4:
Eval was built for conditions like this.
If you wanted another method, you'd have to use a pure Javascript implementation of the exact thing eval is going to do.
- The hard part is not the parsing of numbers and operators
- The hard part is applying order of operation and recursive control
Here's a quick basic example I came up with (updated (2011-06-26): cleaner w/ input boxes).
http://jsfiddle.net/vol7ron/6cdfA/
Note:
- it only handles the basic operators
- it does not check the validity of the numbers (example: divide by zero)
- it has not implemented parenthetical operation
- for all these reasons and more, eval would be a better choice
Edit (2017-05-26) to use SO Snippet:
function calculate(input) {
var f = {
add: '+',
sub: '-',
div: '/',
mlt: '*',
mod: '%',
exp: '^'
};
// Create array for Order of Operation and precedence
f.ooo = [
[
[f.mlt],
[f.div],
[f.mod],
[f.exp]
],
[
[f.add],
[f.sub]
]
];
input = input.replace(/[^0-9%^*\/()\-+.]/g, ''); // clean up unnecessary characters
var output;
for (var i = 0, n = f.ooo.length; i < n; i++) {
// Regular Expression to look for operators between floating numbers or integers
var re = new RegExp('(\\d+\\.?\\d*)([\\' + f.ooo[i].join('\\') + '])(\\d+\\.?\\d*)');
re.lastIndex = 0; // take precautions and reset re starting pos
// Loop while there is still calculation for level of precedence
while (re.test(input)) {
output = _calculate(RegExp.$1, RegExp.$2, RegExp.$3);
if (isNaN(output) || !isFinite(output))
return output; // exit early if not a number
input = input.replace(re, output);
}
}
return output;
function _calculate(a, op, b) {
a = a * 1;
b = b * 1;
switch (op) {
case f.add:
return a + b;
break;
case f.sub:
return a - b;
break;
case f.div:
return a / b;
break;
case f.mlt:
return a * b;
break;
case f.mod:
return a % b;
break;
case f.exp:
return Math.pow(a, b);
break;
default:
null;
}
}
}label {
display: inline-block;
width: 4em;
}<div>
<label for="input">Equation: </label>
<input type="text" id="input" value="12/5*9+9.4*2-1" />
<input type="button"
value="calculate"
onclick="getElementById('result').value = calculate(getElementById('input').value)" />
</div>
<div>
<label for="result">Result: </label>
<input type="text" id="result" />
</div>回答5:
Here is an implementation of the Shunting-yard algorithm with additional support for unary prefix (e.g. -) and postfix (e.g. !) operators, and function (e.g. sqrt()) notations. More operators/functions can be easily defined with the Calculation.defineOperator method:
"use strict";
class Calculation {
constructor() {
this._symbols = {};
this.defineOperator("!", this.factorial, "postfix", 6);
this.defineOperator("^", Math.pow, "infix", 5, true);
this.defineOperator("*", this.multiplication, "infix", 4);
this.defineOperator("/", this.division, "infix", 4);
this.defineOperator("+", this.last, "prefix", 3);
this.defineOperator("-", this.negation, "prefix", 3);
this.defineOperator("+", this.addition, "infix", 2);
this.defineOperator("-", this.subtraction, "infix", 2);
this.defineOperator(",", Array.of, "infix", 1);
this.defineOperator("(", this.last, "prefix");
this.defineOperator(")", null, "postfix");
this.defineOperator("min", Math.min);
this.defineOperator("sqrt", Math.sqrt);
}
// Method allowing to extend an instance with more operators and functions:
defineOperator(symbol, f, notation = "func", precedence = 0, rightToLeft = false) {
// Store operators keyed by their symbol/name. Some symbols may represent
// different usages: e.g. "-" can be unary or binary, so they are also
// keyed by their notation (prefix, infix, postfix, func):
if (notation === "func") precedence = 0;
this._symbols[symbol] = Object.assign({}, this._symbols[symbol], {
[notation]: {
symbol, f, notation, precedence, rightToLeft,
argCount: 1 + (notation === "infix")
},
symbol,
regSymbol: symbol.replace(/[\\^$*+?.()|[\]{}]/g, '\\$&')
+ (/\w$/.test(symbol) ? "\\b" : "") // add a break if it's a name
});
}
last(...a) { return a[a.length-1] }
negation(a) { return -a }
addition(a, b) { return a + b }
subtraction(a, b) { return a - b }
multiplication(a, b) { return a * b }
division(a, b) { return a / b }
factorial(a) {
if (a%1 || !(+a>=0)) return NaN
if (a > 170) return Infinity;
let b = 1;
while (a > 1) b *= a--;
return b;
}
calculate(expression) {
let match;
const values = [],
operators = [this._symbols["("].prefix],
exec = _ => {
let op = operators.pop();
values.push(op.f(...[].concat(...values.splice(-op.argCount))));
return op.precedence;
},
error = msg => {
let notation = match ? match.index : expression.length;
return `${msg} at ${notation}:\n${expression}\n${' '.repeat(notation)}^`;
},
pattern = new RegExp(
// Pattern for numbers
"\\d+(?:\\.\\d+)?|"
// ...and patterns for individual operators/function names
+ Object.values(this._symbols)
// longer symbols should be listed first
.sort( (a, b) => b.symbol.length - a.symbol.length )
.map( val => val.regSymbol ).join('|')
+ "|(\\S)", "g"
);
let afterValue = false;
pattern.lastIndex = 0; // Reset regular expression object
do {
match = pattern.exec(expression);
const [token, bad] = match || [")", undefined],
notNumber = this._symbols[token],
notNewValue = notNumber && !notNumber.prefix && !notNumber.func,
notAfterValue = !notNumber || !notNumber.postfix && !notNumber.infix;
// Check for syntax errors:
if (bad || (afterValue ? notAfterValue : notNewValue)) return error("Syntax error");
if (afterValue) {
// We either have an infix or postfix operator (they should be mutually exclusive)
const curr = notNumber.postfix || notNumber.infix;
do {
const prev = operators[operators.length-1];
if (((curr.precedence - prev.precedence) || prev.rightToLeft) > 0) break;
// Apply previous operator, since it has precedence over current one
} while (exec()); // Exit loop after executing an opening parenthesis or function
afterValue = curr.notation === "postfix";
if (curr.symbol !== ")") {
operators.push(curr);
// Postfix always has precedence over any operator that follows after it
if (afterValue) exec();
}
} else if (notNumber) { // prefix operator or function
operators.push(notNumber.prefix || notNumber.func);
if (notNumber.func) { // Require an opening parenthesis
match = pattern.exec(expression);
if (!match || match[0] !== "(") return error("Function needs parentheses")
}
} else { // number
values.push(+token);
afterValue = true;
}
} while (match && operators.length);
return operators.length ? error("Missing closing parenthesis")
: match ? error("Too many closing parentheses")
: values.pop() // All done!
}
}
Calculation = new Calculation(); // Create a singleton
// I/O handling
function perform() {
const expr = document.getElementById('expr').value,
result = Calculation.calculate(expr);
document.getElementById('out').textContent = isNaN(result) ? result : '=' + result;
}
document.getElementById('expr').addEventListener('input', perform);
perform();
// Tests
const tests = [
{ expr: '1+2', expected: 3 },
{ expr: '1+2*3', expected: 7 },
{ expr: '1+2*3^2', expected: 19 },
{ expr: '1+2*2^3^2', expected: 1025 },
{ expr: '-3!', expected: -6 },
{ expr: '12---11+1-3', expected: -1 },
{ expr: 'min(2,1,3)', expected: 1 },
{ expr: '(2,1,3)', expected: 3 },
{ expr: '4-min(sqrt(2+2*7),9,5)', expected: 0 },
{ expr: '2,3,10', expected: 10 }
]
for (let {expr, expected} of tests) {
let result = Calculation.calculate(expr);
console.assert(result === expected, `${expr} should be ${expected}, but gives ${result}`);
}#expr { width: 100%; font-family: monospace }Expression: <input id="expr" value="min(-1,0)+((sqrt(16)+(-4+7)!*---4)/2)^2^3"><p>
<pre id="out"></pre>回答6:
If you don't want to use eval you will have to use an existing expression evaluator library.
http://silentmatt.com/javascript-expression-evaluator/
http://www.codeproject.com/KB/scripting/jsexpressioneval.aspx
You can also roll one of your own :)
回答7:
You can't, at most you could do something retort like parsing the numbers and then separating the operations with a switch, and making them. Other than that, I'd use eval in this case.
That would be something like (a real implementation will be somewhat more complex, specially if you consider the use of parenthesis, but you get the idea)
function operate(text) {
var values = text.split("+");
return parseInt(values[0]) + parseInt(values[1]);
}
alert(operate("9+2"));
Still I think the best choice you can make is to use eval, given that you're able to trust the source of the string.
回答8:
I spent a couple of hours to implement all the arithmetical rules without using eval() and finally I published a package on npm string-math. Everything is in the description. Enjoy
回答9:
If you're looking for a syntactical equivalent to eval, you could use new Function. There are slight differences regarding scoping, but they mostly behave the same, including exposure to much of the same security risks:
let str = "12/5*9+9.4*2"
let res1 = eval(str)
console.log('res1:', res1)
let res2 = (new Function('return '+str)())
console.log('res2:', res2)回答10:
This solution also clips whitespaces and checks for duplicating operators
e.g. ' 1+ 2 *2' // 5 but ' 1 + +2* 2 ' // Error
function calcMe(str) {
const noWsStr = str.replace(/\s/g, '');
const operators = noWsStr.replace(/[\d.,]/g, '').split('');
const operands = noWsStr.replace(/[+/%*-]/g, ' ')
.replace(/\,/g, '.')
.split(' ')
.map(parseFloat)
.filter(it => it);
if (operators.length >= operands.length){
throw new Error('Operators qty must be lesser than operands qty')
};
while (operators.includes('*')) {
let opIndex = operators.indexOf('*');
operands.splice(opIndex, 2, operands[opIndex] * operands[opIndex + 1]);
operators.splice(opIndex, 1);
};
while (operators.includes('/')) {
let opIndex = operators.indexOf('/');
operands.splice(opIndex, 2, operands[opIndex] / operands[opIndex + 1]);
operators.splice(opIndex, 1);
};
while (operators.includes('%')) {
let opIndex = operators.indexOf('%');
operands.splice(opIndex, 2, operands[opIndex] % operands[opIndex + 1]);
operators.splice(opIndex, 1);
};
let result = operands[0];
for (let i = 0; i < operators.length; i++) {
operators[i] === '+' ? (result += operands[i + 1]) : (result -= operands[i + 1])
}
return result
}
This shows to be more performant than @vol7ron's solution.
Check this JSBenchmark
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6479236/calculate-string-value-in-javascript-not-using-eval