问题
I have nodes like this and I need apply filter to them
{
"value": "ma",
"object_field_id": 2293
}
{
"value": 2,
"object_field_id": 2294
}
MATCH (:UserData {user_id:19})-[:CARD]-(c:Card)-[:FIELD_GROUP]-()-[:FIELD]-(fi:Field)
WHERE fi.object_field_id IN [23,24]
AND (fi.value=~('(?iu).*149.*')
AND fi.value=~('(?iu).*gb.*'))
RETURN c
but it doesn't work with AND
Where is my mistake?
回答1:
Here Is Query data for to build relations and nodes:
CREATE (a:UserData {user_id: 19})-[r:CARD]->(b:Card {name: "card"})
WITH count(*) as dummy
CREATE (a:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1290})
WITH count(*) as dummy
CREATE (a:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1280})
WITH count(*) as dummy
CREATE (a:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1270})
WITH count(*) as dummy
MATCH (u:FieldUserGroup), (c:Card) CREATE (c)-[:FIELD_GROUP]->(u)
WITH count(*) as dummy
create (f:Field {value: "jerry", object_field_id: 11})
WITH count(*) as dummy
create (f:Field {value: 2, object_field_id: 12})
WITH count(*) as dummy
create (f:Field {value: "tom", object_field_id: 13})
WITH count(*) as dummy
MATCH (f:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1290}), (f2:Field) CREATE (f)-[:FIELD]->(f2)
WITH count(*) as dummy
CREATE (c:Field {value: "jack", object_field_id: 14})
WITH count(*) as dummy
CREATE (c:Field {value: 1234, object_field_id: 15})
WITH count(*) as dummy
CREATE (c:Field {value: "robin", object_field_id: 16})
WITH count(*) as dummy
MATCH (f:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1280}), (c:Field {value: "jack", object_field_id: 14}) CREATE (f)-[:FIELD]->(c)
WITH count(*) as dummy
MATCH (f:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1280}), (c:Field {value: 1234, object_field_id: 15}) CREATE (f)-[:FIELD]->(c)
WITH count(*) as dummy
MATCH (f:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1280}), (c:Field {value: "robin", object_field_id: 16}) CREATE (f)-[:FIELD]->(c)
WITH count(*) as dummy
CREATE (c:Field {value: "zazaza", object_field_id: 17})
WITH count(*) as dummy
CREATE (c:Field {value: 6578970, object_field_id: 18})
WITH count(*) as dummy
CREATE (c:Field {value: "hamlet", object_field_id: 19})
WITH count(*) as dummy
MATCH (f:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1270}), (c:Field {value: "zazaza", object_field_id: 17}) CREATE (f)-[:FIELD]->(c)
WITH count(*) as dummy
MATCH (f:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1270}), (c:Field {value: 6578970, object_field_id: 18}) CREATE (f)-[:FIELD]->(c)
WITH count(*) as dummy
MATCH (f:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1270}), (c:Field {value: "hamlet", object_field_id: 19}) CREATE (f)-[:FIELD]->(c)
WITH count(*) as dummy
CREATE (r:card {name: "card2"})
WITH count(*) as dummy
MATCH (r:card {name: "card2"}), (a:UserData {user_id: 19}) CREATE (a)-[:CARD]->(r)
WITH count(*) as dummy
CREATE (a:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1260})
WITH count(*) as dummy
CREATE (a:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1250})
WITH count(*) as dummy
CREATE (a:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1240})
WITH count(*) as dummy
MATCH (f:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1260}), (r:card {name: "card2"}) CREATE (r)-[:CARD]->(f)
WITH count(*) as dummy
MATCH (f:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1250}), (r:card {name: "card2"}) CREATE (r)-[:CARD]->(f)
WITH count(*) as dummy
MATCH (f:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1240}), (r:card {name: "card2"}) CREATE (r)-[:CARD]->(f)
WITH count(*) as dummy
CREATE (c:Field {value: "some value", object_field_id: 20})
WITH count(*) as dummy
CREATE (c:Field {value: "more value", object_field_id: 21})
WITH count(*) as dummy
CREATE (c:Field {value: "this is insane!", object_field_id: 22})
WITH count(*) as dummy
MATCH (f:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1260}), (c:Field {object_field_id: 20}) CREATE (f)-[:FIELD]->(c)
WITH count(*) as dummy
MATCH (f:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1260}), (c:Field {object_field_id: 21}) CREATE (f)-[:FIELD]->(c)
WITH count(*) as dummy
MATCH (f:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1260}), (c:Field {object_field_id: 22}) CREATE (f)-[:FIELD]->(c)
WITH count(*) as dummy
CREATE (c:Field {value: 14948576, object_field_id: 23})
WITH count(*) as dummy
CREATE (c:Field {value: "GB", object_field_id: 24})
WITH count(*) as dummy
CREATE (c:Field {value: 1, object_field_id: 25})
WITH count(*) as dummy
MATCH (f:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1250}), (c:Field {object_field_id: 23}) CREATE (f)-[:FIELD]->(c)
WITH count(*) as dummy
MATCH (f:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1250}), (c:Field {object_field_id: 24}) CREATE (f)-[:FIELD]->(c)
WITH count(*) as dummy
MATCH (f:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1250}), (c:Field {object_field_id: 25}) CREATE (f)-[:FIELD]->(c)
WITH count(*) as dummy
CREATE (c:Field {value: 2, object_field_id: 26})
WITH count(*) as dummy
CREATE (c:Field {value: "Marky", object_field_id: 27})
WITH count(*) as dummy
CREATE (c:Field {value: "Tom Born", object_field_id: 28})
WITH count(*) as dummy
MATCH (f:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1240}), (c:Field {object_field_id: 26}) CREATE (f)-[:FIELD]->(c)
WITH count(*) as dummy
MATCH (f:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1240}), (c:Field {object_field_id: 27}) CREATE (f)-[:FIELD]->(c)
WITH count(*) as dummy
MATCH (f:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1240}), (c:Field {object_field_id: 28}) CREATE (f)-[:FIELD]->(c)
WITH count(*) as dummy
回答2:
UPD:
Here is query that works but only in one side by FieldUserGroup
MATCH (c:Card)-[:FIELD_GROUP]-()-[:FIELD]-(fi:Field) where (any(prop in keys(fi) where fi[prop] =~ '(?iu).*tom.*'))
return c
回答3:
I cleaned up your Cypher queries to create the database, hopefully I didn't make any mistakes. You will notice that I removed all of the WITH count(*) as dummy
as they are not needed and only cause errors. For the statements that have both MATCH
and CREATE
they needed a WITH
. I reordered and grouped similar statements so that they can all be done in one statement, e.g. end with ;
.
CREATE (:UserData {user_id: 19});
MATCH (n:UserData {user_id: 19})
WITH n
CREATE (n)-[:CARD]->(:Card {name: "card"});
CREATE (:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1290})
CREATE (:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1280})
CREATE (:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1270});
MATCH (f1:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1290}),
(f2:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1280}),
(f3:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1270}),
(c1:Card {name: "card"})
WITH f1,f2,f3,c1
CREATE (c1)-[:FIELD_GROUP]->(f1)
CREATE (c1)-[:FIELD_GROUP]->(f2)
CREATE (c1)-[:FIELD_GROUP]->(f3);
CREATE (:Field {value: "jerry", object_field_id: 11})
CREATE (:Field {value: 2, object_field_id: 12})
CREATE (:Field {value: "tom", object_field_id: 13})
CREATE (:Field {value: "jack", object_field_id: 14})
CREATE (:Field {value: 1234, object_field_id: 15})
CREATE (:Field {value: "robin", object_field_id: 16})
CREATE (:Field {value: "zazaza", object_field_id: 17})
CREATE (:Field {value: 6578970, object_field_id: 18})
CREATE (:Field {value: "hamlet", object_field_id: 19});
MATCH (f1:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1290}),
(c11:Field {value: "jerry"}),
(c12:Field {value: 2}),
(c13:Field {value: "tom"}),
(f2:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1280}),
(c21:Field {value: "jack"}),
(c22:Field {value: 1234}),
(c23:Field {value: "robin"}),
(f3:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1270}),
(c31:Field {value: "zazaza"}),
(c32:Field {value: 6578970}),
(c33:Field {value: "hamlet"})
WITH f1,f2,f3,c11,c12,c13,c21,c22,c23,c31,c32,c33
CREATE (f1)-[:FIELD]->(c11)
CREATE (f1)-[:FIELD]->(c12)
CREATE (f1)-[:FIELD]->(c13)
CREATE (f2)-[:FIELD]->(c21)
CREATE (f2)-[:FIELD]->(c22)
CREATE (f2)-[:FIELD]->(c23)
CREATE (f3)-[:FIELD]->(c31)
CREATE (f3)-[:FIELD]->(c32)
CREATE (f3)-[:FIELD]->(c33);
MATCH (n:UserData {user_id: 19})
WITH n
CREATE (n)-[:CARD]->(:Card {name: "card2"});
CREATE (:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1240})
CREATE (:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1250})
CREATE (:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1260});
MATCH (f1:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1240}),
(f2:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1250}),
(f3:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1260}),
(c1:Card {name: "card2"})
WITH f1,f2,f3,c1
CREATE (c1)-[:FIELD_GROUP]->(f1)
CREATE (c1)-[:FIELD_GROUP]->(f2)
CREATE (c1)-[:FIELD_GROUP]->(f3);
CREATE (:Field {value: "some value", object_field_id: 20})
CREATE (:Field {value: "more value", object_field_id: 21})
CREATE (:Field {value: "this is insane!", object_field_id: 22})
CREATE (:Field {value: 14948576, object_field_id: 23})
CREATE (:Field {value: "GB", object_field_id: 24})
CREATE (:Field {value: 1, object_field_id: 25})
CREATE (:Field {value: 2, object_field_id: 26})
CREATE (:Field {value: "Marky", object_field_id: 27})
CREATE (:Field {value: "Tom Born", object_field_id: 28});
MATCH (f1:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1240}),
(c11:Field {value: 2, object_field_id: 26}),
(c12:Field {value: "Marky"}),
(c13:Field {value: "Tom Born"}),
(f2:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1250}),
(c21:Field {value: 14948576}),
(c22:Field {value: "GB"}),
(c23:Field {value: 1}),
(f3:FieldUserGroup {data_id: 1260}),
(c31:Field {value: "some value"}),
(c32:Field {value: "more value"}),
(c33:Field {value: "this is insane!"})
WITH f1,f2,f3,c11,c12,c13,c21,c22,c23,c31,c32,c33
CREATE (f1)-[:FIELD]->(c11)
CREATE (f1)-[:FIELD]->(c12)
CREATE (f1)-[:FIELD]->(c13)
CREATE (f2)-[:FIELD]->(c21)
CREATE (f2)-[:FIELD]->(c22)
CREATE (f2)-[:FIELD]->(c23)
CREATE (f3)-[:FIELD]->(c31)
CREATE (f3)-[:FIELD]->(c32)
CREATE (f3)-[:FIELD]->(c33);
The original query
MATCH (:UserData {user_id:19})-[:CARD]-(c:Card)-[:FIELD_GROUP]-()-[:FIELD]-(fi:Field)
WHERE fi.object_field_id IN [23,24]
AND (fi.value=~('(?iu).*149.*')
AND fi.value=~('(?iu).*gb.*'))
RETURN c
is working correctly when it returns no records. This is because there are no nodes that match this part of the query
MATCH (fi:Field)
WHERE fi.value=~('(?iu).*149.*')
RETURN fi;
which also returns no records. The AND
clause is working as it should.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53375136/neo4j-dynamic-query-with-multiple-filters-on-nodes