Add property to anonymous type after creation

主宰稳场 提交于 2019-11-27 11:37:29

If you're trying to extend this method:

public static MvcHtmlString ActionLink(this HtmlHelper htmlHelper, string linkText, string actionName, object routeValues);

Although I'm sure Khaja's Object extensions would work, you might get better performance by creating a RouteValueDictionary and passing in the routeValues object, add your additional parameters from the Context, then return using the ActionLink overload that takes a RouteValueDictionary instead of an object:

This should do the trick:

    public static MvcHtmlString MyLink(this HtmlHelper helper, string linkText, string actionName, object routeValues)
    {
        RouteValueDictionary routeValueDictionary = new RouteValueDictionary(routeValues);

        // Add more parameters
        foreach (string parameter in helper.ViewContext.RequestContext.HttpContext.Request.QueryString.AllKeys)
        {
            routeValueDictionary.Add(parameter, helper.ViewContext.RequestContext.HttpContext.Request.QueryString[parameter]);
        }

        return helper.ActionLink(linkText, actionName, routeValueDictionary);
    }
Khaja Minhajuddin

The following extension class would get you what you need.

public static class ObjectExtensions
{
    public static IDictionary<string, object> AddProperty(this object obj, string name, object value)
    {
        var dictionary = obj.ToDictionary();
        dictionary.Add(name, value);
        return dictionary;
    }

    // helper
    public static IDictionary<string, object> ToDictionary(this object obj)
    {
        IDictionary<string, object> result = new Dictionary<string, object>();
        PropertyDescriptorCollection properties = TypeDescriptor.GetProperties(obj);
        foreach (PropertyDescriptor property in properties){
            result.Add(property.Name, property.GetValue(obj));
        }
        return result;
    }
}

I assume you mean anonymous types here, e.g. new { Name1=value1, Name2=value2} etc. If so, you're out of luck - anonymous types are normal types in that they're fixed, compiled code. They just happen to be autogenerated.

What you could do is write new { old.Name1, old.Name2, ID=myId } but I don't know if that's really what you want. Some more details on the situation (including code samples) would be ideal.

Alternatively, you could create a container object which always had an ID and whatever other object contained the rest of the properties.

public static string TextBox(this HtmlHelper html, string value, string labelText, string textBoxId, object textBoxHtmlAttributes, object labelHtmlAttributes){}

This would accept the id value the textbox should have and the label should refer to. If the consumer now doesn't include the "id" property in the textBoxHtmlAttributes, the method will create an incorrect label.

I can check through reflection if this attribute is added in the labelHtmlAttributes object. If so, I want to add it or create a new anonymous object that has it added. But because I can't create a new anonymous type by walking through the old attributes and adding my own "id" attribute, I'm kind of stuck.

A container with a strongly typed ID property and then an anonymous typed "attributes" property would require code rewrites that don't weigh up to the "add an id field" requirement.

Hope this response is understandable. It's the end of the day, can't get my brains in line anymore..

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!