问题
To improve my Haskell skills, I'm trying to solve the Advent of Code 2018. As expected, I am already stuck on day 1, specifically on part 2:
--- Part Two ---
You notice that the device repeats the same frequency change list over and over.
To calibrate the device, you need to find the first frequency it reaches twice.
For example, using the same list of changes above, the device would loop as follows:
Current frequency 0, change of +1; resulting frequency 1.
Current frequency 1, change of -2; resulting frequency -1.
Current frequency -1, change of +3; resulting frequency 2.
Current frequency 2, change of +1; resulting frequency 3.
(At this point, the device continues from the start of the list.)
Current frequency 3, change of +1; resulting frequency 4.
Current frequency 4, change of -2; resulting frequency 2, which has already been seen.
In this example, the first frequency reached twice is
2. Note that your device might need to repeat its list of frequency changes many times before a duplicate frequency is found, and that duplicates might be found while in the middle of processing the list.Here are other examples:
+1, -1 first reaches 0 twice.
+3, +3, +4, -2, -4 first reaches 10 twice.
-6, +3, +8, +5, -6 first reaches 5 twice.
+7, +7, -2, -7, -4 first reaches 14 twice.
What is the first frequency your device reaches twice?
Basically, I have a very large list vals::[Int] that includes all the frequency changes mentioned above.
Here is the function I wrote for solving this problem:
-- [1] The list of frequency changes
-- [2] The first repeat frequency
-- [1] [2]
part2helper :: [Int] -> Int
part2helper ds = go ds []
where go ds [] = go ds [0]
go (d:ds) [f] = go ds $ (f+d):[f]
go (d:ds) (f:fs) =
if f `elem` fs then f
else go ds $ (d+f):f:fs
I test this function with the values provided in the description in ghci:
*Main> part2helper (cycle [1, -2, 3, 1])
2
*Main> part2helper (cycle [1, -1])
0
*Main> part2helper (cycle [3, 3, 4, -2, -4])
10
*Main> part2helper (cycle [7, 7, -2, -7, -4])
14
*Main>
All result are correct, so I assume my function works correctly. The problem now is, when I compile this into a program that reads the input list from a file, the program never terminates. Here's the code:
module Main where
import System.Environment
main = do
[input] <- getArgs
s <- readFile input
let n = lines $ s
vals = map (read::String->Int) $ fmap (filter (/='+')) n
sol = part2helper (cycle vals)
print sol
-- [1] The list of frequency changes
-- [2] The first repeat frequency
-- [1] [2]
part2helper :: [Int] -> Int
part2helper ds = go ds []
where go ds [] = go ds [0]
go (d:ds) [f] = go ds $ (f+d):[f]
go (d:ds) (f:fs) =
if f `elem` fs then f
else go ds $ (d+f):f:fs
This builds with GHC correctly, but as I said, never terminates and prints no result. What am I missing? The input file can be found here.
回答1:
You're trying to put everything together in a single function. It's much better if you work in a modular fashion, breaking the problem into smaller ones.
Here's an idea,
- generate the sequence of frequencies,
f0, f1, f2... - generate the sequence of cumulative sets of frequencies
{}, {f0}, {f0,f1}, {f0,f1,f2}... - check repeated insertions, i.e.
fisuch thatfi ∈ {f0..fi-1}
To make things clearer regarding the last point consider,
f0, f1, f2, f3...
{}, {f0}, {f0,f1}, {f0,f1,f2}...`
if f3 were a repetition then f3 ∈ {f0,f1,f2}
This may seem terribly inefficient but because Haskell is lazy, these lists will be generated as needed.
We'll need to import modules to work with sets and maybes,
import Data.Set
import Data.Maybe
Generating the frequencies from the first frequency and a list of frequency changes can be done via scanl (+). The function scanl (+) x xs operates the elements of xs with the operator + , starting at x, generating the cumulative list of sums.
freqs :: Int -> [Int] -> [Int]
freqs = scanl (+)
Now we can generate the list of sets. Here too we use a scanl. In each step we insert a new frequency, and we start with the empty set.
sets :: [Int] -> [Set Int]
sets = scanl (\s x -> insert x s) (empty)
Once we have the frequencies and the sets we are pretty much done.The main function just puts everything together. It combines both lists and finds the first pair (fi , {f0,...,fi-1}) such that fi ∈ {f0,...,fi-1}, and returns the corresponding fi
result :: Int -> [Int] -> Maybe Int
result x xs = let fs = freqs x xs
ss = sets fs
r = find (\(y,s) -> y `elem` s) (zip fs ss)
in fmap fst r
Note find returns a Maybe (Int, Set Int). It may find Nothing or return Just (x,s) for some frequency x that was already in s. We use fmap fst to turn Just (x,s) into Just x.
EDIT
Once you've got things working if you wish to, may optimize a few things, or play around with your style. The following is a more succinct, and possibly a little bit more efficient version.
The list of frequencies and sets can be built together in one go.
freqsets :: Int -> [Int] -> [(Int, Set Int)]
freqsets f0 = scanl (\(f,s) x -> (f+x,insert f s)) (f0,empty)
And so it's ready to use for the result function. Also we can take advantage of Maybe being a monad to make things a bit more readable.
result :: Int -> [Int] -> Maybe Int
result f0 xs = do (f,_) <- find(\(y,s)->y `elem` s) (freqsets f0 xs)
return f
And there you have it, a rather short solution. I like the change in the result function. I like the do notation, as well as not having it calculate the zipping of the two previous lists. I'm not so sure if "fusing" the building of both lists is worth it. It's a bit less readable. Using three functions, one for frequencies, one for sets, and one for zipping, might be best.
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53771818/recursive-haskell-function-seemingly-doesnt-terminate