问题
I am trying to use a double void
pointer but I am a little bit confused about the usage.
I have a struct
that contains a void **
array.
struct Thing{
void ** array;
};
struct Thing * c = malloc (sizeof(struct Thing));
c->array = malloc( 10 * sizeof(void *) );
So If I want to assign a different object to each pointer and try to retrieve the value
// Option 1
*(c->array + index) = (void *) some_object_ptr;
// Option 2
c->array[index] = (void *) some_object_ptr;
then, I have another function that gives (void *) item
that points to each cell, not the some_object_ptr
.
If I want to retrieve the value which pointed to by some_object_ptr
,
should I do
function return type is 'void *' and takes argument 'void *'
// Option 3
return (void**) item
// Option 4
return *((void**)item)?
the weird thing is that when I used array the array subscript method I couldn't use option 4, only option 3; and when I used *(c->array + index)
I could only use opt.4. and not opt.3. ..
Can anyone please tell me about this? If I am making any invalid assumptions, then could you please correct me?
回答1:
A void **
is just a pointer to a pointer to memory with an unspecified type. You can only dereference it once (since you can't dereference a void *
). However, apart from that, it is basically like any other pointer type. If it helps you, think of it the same way as you would with int *
.
So, in your specific situation, we have:
void** array;
int arrayLen = 10;
array = (void**)malloc(arrayLen * sizeof(void*));
some_type_t* some_object_ptr;
// The following two assignment are equivalent since in C,
// array[index] <=> *(array + index)
array[index] = (void*)some_object_ptr;
*(array + index) = (void*)some_object_ptr;
Then array
is a pointer to the whole array, while *array
is a pointer to the first element, since it is equivalent to array[0]
.
回答2:
One quick hint about pointers: if you are casting it, you are probably doing something wrong.
As for your question. I am not sure what item
is in your problem. In your first part you've already discovered how to acces a member in your array. You could simply use it:
void *get_item(Thing *c, int index)
{
return *(c->array + index); // or return c->array[index];
}
If you need the address of the pointer at index:
void **get_item_cell(Thing *c, int index)
{
return c->array + index; // or return &c->array[index];
}
In the second part, you don't dereference the pointer (for + option), or take the address of array result, since it automatically dereferences it.
EDIT: I think I now know what you want. You have a function similar to my second one above, but it is:
void *get_item_cell(Thing *c, int index)
{
return (void *)(c->array + index);
}
You want to dereference the value returned from this function, and access the object. In that case, you can only use Option 4 safely. Since you don't have the index, you cannot move to any other cell (you don't know if you are at the end of the array, or at the beginning - so no additions or subtractions). You can only fix the mistake of the above function: cast to void **
, and then dereference it: *(void **)item
. This will give you a void *
. If you want to access the object pointed from this cell, you need to cast that to the correct type as well: some_object_ptr *obj = *(void**)item
.
回答3:
The fact you are working with void*
and void**
doesn't matter, pointer arithmetic still works fine, so both options you wrote are correct.
Here's an example:
struct Thing
{
void ** array;
};
struct Object
{
int i;
char c;
};
int main ()
{
struct Thing * c = malloc (sizeof(struct Thing));
c->array = malloc(10 * sizeof(void*));
struct Object * o = malloc (sizeof(struct Object));
o->i = 2; o->c = 'a';
*(c->array + 2) = o;
printf("Object: i = %d, c = %c\n", ((Object*)c->array[2])->i, ((Object*)c->array[2])->c);
free(o);
free(c->array);
free(c);
return 0;
}
Since it's void*
you can put there pointer to whatever, just don't forget it to cast to original type before using it ;)
回答4:
Almighty push!
any_type x ;
void * v = * ( void * * ) & x ;
almighty pull!
void * v ;
any_type x = * ( any_type * ) & v ;
beware of losing/gaining digits
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/9040818/how-to-use-void-pointer-correctly