问题
In dplyr I can replace NA with 0 using the following code. The issue is this inserts a list into my data frame which screws up further analysis down the line. I don't even understand lists or atomic vectors or any of that at this point. I just want to pick certain columns, and replace all occurrences of NA with zero. And maintain the columns integer status.
library(dplyr)
df <- tibble(x = c(1, 2, NA), y = c("a", NA, "b"), z = list(1:5, NULL, 10:20))
df
df %>% replace_na(list(x = 0, y = "unknown"))
That works but transforms the column into a list. How do I do it without transforming the column into a list?
And here's how to do it in base R. But not sure how to work this into a mutate statement:
df$x[is.na(df$x)] <- 0
回答1:
What version of dplyr
are you using? It might be an old one. The replace_na
function now seems to be in tidyr
. This works
library(tidyr)
df <- tibble::tibble(x = c(1, 2, NA), y = c("a", NA, "b"), z = list(1:5, NULL, 10:20))
df %>% replace_na(list(x = 0, y = "unknown")) %>% str()
# Classes ‘tbl_df’, ‘tbl’ and 'data.frame': 3 obs. of 3 variables:
# $ x: num 1 2 0
# $ y: chr "a" "unknown" "b"
# $ z:List of 3
# ..$ : int 1 2 3 4 5
# ..$ : NULL
# ..$ : int 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ...
We can see the NA values have been replaced and the columns x
and y
are still atomic vectors. Tested with tidyr_0.7.2
.
回答2:
dt <- mutate(dt, x = ifelse(is.na(x), 0, x))
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/49947592/replace-na-with-zero-in-dplyr-without-using-list