问题
While it makes sense intuitively that references passed to spawned threads need to have static lifetimes, I'm unclear about what exactly is making the following code not compile:
use std::sync::Arc;
use std::sync::Mutex;
struct M;
fn do_something(m : Arc<Mutex<&M>>) {
println!("Ha, do nothing!");
}
fn main() {
let a = M;
{
let c : Arc<Mutex<&M>> = Arc::new(Mutex::new(&a));
for i in 0..2 {
let c_clone = c.clone();
::std::thread::spawn(move || do_something(c_clone));
}
}
}
Compiling this small program gives the following error:
$ rustc -o test test.rs
test.rs:13:55: 13:56 error: `a` does not live long enough
test.rs:13 let c : Arc<Mutex<&M>> = Arc::new(Mutex::new(&a));
^
note: reference must be valid for the static lifetime...
It seems to me that the variable a
will out-live c_clone
, which is what matters in this case...? Hopefully someone can help me understand what I'm missing!
回答1:
In its essence, the Arc
and Mutex
wrapping is superfluous: you are passing a reference to something on the local stack. When you spawn a thread with std::thread::spawn
, there is nothing linking the lifetimes together; the main thread is quite at liberty to conclude and free anything in it—in this case, including a
—before any other threads it spawns even start executing; thus in this case a
could refer to freed memory by the time the spawned thread does anything, leaving c_clone
as a dangling pointer. This is why the environment of the closure of a spawned thread must be 'static
.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/32981382/thread-references-require-static-lifetime