Understanding Traits and Object Safety

问题

I am struggling with the basics of object safety. If I have this code

struct S {
    x: i32
}

trait Trait: Sized {
    fn f(&self) -> i32 where Self: Sized;
}

fn object_safety_dynamic(x: Trait) {}

I receive

fn object_safety_dynamic(x: Trait) {
   | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `traits::Trait` cannot be made into an object
= note: the trait cannot require that `Self : Sized`

When adding / changing :Sized as the trait's inheritance or f's bound I receive slightly different error messages.

Could someone explain:

• Why does this particular example not work? The chapter Trait Objects states "So what makes a method object-safe? Each method must require that Self: Sized". Isn't that fulfilled?

• What is the difference between Trait: Sized and where Self: Sized? (Well, yes, one inherits the trait the other one is a parameter bound, but from Rust's trait object perspective?

• What is the preferred change I had to make object_safety_dynamic work?

I am using rustc 1.19.0-nightly (01951a61a 2017-05-20) if it matters.

Edit – Follow Up:

Addressing the comment on fixed sizes.

trait TraitB {
    fn f(&self) -> i32 where Self: Sized;

    fn g<T>(&self, t:T) -> i32 where Self: Sized;
}

回答1:

Why does this particular example not work? The chapter Trait Objects states "So what makes a method object-safe? Each method must require that Self: Sized". Isn't that fulfilled?

This question really is: What is a Trait Object?

A Trait Object is an interface in the Object-Oriented paradigm:

• it exposes a limited set of methods,
• which are applied to an unknown concrete type.

The fact that the concrete type to which the operations is applied is unknown is specifically why one uses a Trait Object, as it allows manipulating a heterogeneous set of types in a uniform fashion down to the assembly level.

The fact the concrete type is unknown, however, means that the size of the memory area which contains the memory is also unknown; therefore a Trait Object can only be manipulated behind a reference or pointer such as &TraitObject, &mut TraitObject or Box<TraitObject> for example.

At the memory level, each of them is represented identically:

• a pointer to a virtual table, which is a structure holding one function pointer per "method" of the trait object at a fixed offset,
• a pointer to the actual data of the object.

What is the difference between Trait: Sized and where Self: Sized? (Well, yes, one inherits the trait the other one is a parameter bound, but from Rust's trait object perspective?)

There is no inheritance in Rust. In both cases those are bounds:

• Trait: Sized states that the trait itself can only be implemented for a type that already implements Sized,
• fn method(&self) where Self: Sized states that only types that implement Sized can implement this method.

Note: when implementing a trait, all methods must end up having a definition; the latter is therefore only really useful if a default implementation is provided for the method with the Self: Sized bound, as is shown here.

What is the preferred change I had to make object_safety_dynamic work?

You have to take the Trait Object by reference or pointer. Whether you use a reference or pointer depends on whether you want to transfer ownership or not.

回答2:

Making Trait a supertype of Sized doesn't help - in fact it is not permitted, as the error message says. Each implementation of Trait will still have a different size, so your function object_safety_dynamic cannot be compiled. Monomorphization cannot be used here because there is no generic parameter, so the compiled function must work for all implementations of Trait.

However, references do have a fixed size, so making the argument into a reference will work:

trait Trait {
    fn f(&self) -> i32;
}

fn object_safety_dynamic(x: &Trait) {}

A trait object is always a reference of some kind, e.g. a Box<T> or &T. This is precisely because the size of implementations of the trait will be different, while a reference type has a known, fixed size.

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44096235/understanding-traits-and-object-safety