问题
I have written this code. It recursively creates folders in the web system by making REST Calls. So basically, it creates a folder for the root node, then gets all the child nodes and parallely and recursively calls itself. (for each child)
the only problem with the code is that if a node has too may children OR if the hierarchy is too deep, then I start getting "TaskCancellation" errors.
I have already tried increasing the timeout to 10 minutes.. but that does not solve the problem.
So my question is how can I start say 50 tasks, then wait for something to get freed and proceed only when there is an open slot in 50.
Currently I think my code is going on creating tasks without any limit as is flows through the hierarchy.
public async Task CreateSPFolder(Node node, HttpClient client, string docLib, string currentPath = null)
{
string nodeName = Uri.EscapeDataString(nodeName);
var request = new { __metadata = new { type = "SP.Folder" }, ServerRelativeUrl = nodeName };
string jsonRequest = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(request);
StringContent strContent = new StringContent(jsonRequest);
strContent.Headers.ContentType = MediaTypeHeaderValue.Parse("application/json;odata=verbose");
HttpResponseMessage resp = await client.PostAsync(cmd, strContent);
if (resp.IsSuccessStatusCode)
{
currentPath = (currentPath == null) ? nodeName : currentPath + "/" + nodeName;
}
else
{
string content = await resp.Content.ReadAsStringAsync();
Console.WriteLine(content);
throw new Exception("Failed to create folder " + content);
}
}
List<Task> taskList = new List<Task>();
node.Children.ToList().ForEach(c => taskList.Add(CreateSPFolder(c, client, docLib, currentPath)));
Task.WaitAll(taskList.ToArray());
}
回答1:
You can use a SemaphoreSlim
to control the number of concurrent tasks. You initialize the semaphore to the maximum number of tasks you want to have and then each time you execute a task you acquire the semaphore and then release it when you are finished with the task.
This is a somewhat simplified version of your code that runs forever using random numbers and executes a maximum of 2 tasks at the same time.
class Program
{
private static SemaphoreSlim semaphore = new SemaphoreSlim(2, 2);
public static async Task CreateSPFolder(int folder)
{
try
{
await semaphore.WaitAsync();
Console.WriteLine("Executing " + folder);
Console.WriteLine("WaitAsync - CurrentCount " + semaphore.CurrentCount);
await Task.Delay(2000);
}
finally
{
Console.WriteLine("Finished Executing " + folder);
semaphore.Release();
Console.WriteLine("Release - CurrentCount " + semaphore.CurrentCount);
}
var rand = new Random();
var next = rand.Next(10);
var children = Enumerable.Range(1, next).ToList();
Task.WaitAll(children.Select(CreateSPFolder).ToArray());
}
static void Main(string[] args)
{
CreateSPFolder(1).Wait();
Console.ReadKey();
}
}
回答2:
First of all, I think your problem is not the amount of tasks but the amount of blocked threads waiting at Task.WaitAll(taskList.ToArray());
. It's better to wait asynchronously in such cases (i.e. await Task.WhenAll(taskList);
Secondly, you can use TPL Dataflow
's ActionBlock
with a MaxDegreeOfParallelism
set to 50 and just post to it for every folder to be created. That way you have a flat queue of work to be executed and when it's empty, you're done.
Pseudo code:
var block = new ActionBlock<FolderInfo>(
async folderInfo => {
await CreateFolderAsync(folderInfo);
foreach (var subFolder in GetSubFolders(folderInfo))
{
block.Post(subFolder);
}
},
new DataFlowExecutionOptions {MaxDegreeOfParallelism = 5});
block.Post(rootFolderInfo);
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/25561943/control-total-number-of-tasks-when-using-async-await-in-a-recursive-function