问题
Is this legal? Does it contain a hidden bug or flaw? Visual studio does not give any errors or warnings but ReSharper does:
/// <summary>
/// immutable tuple for two
/// </summary>
public class Pair<TValue1, TValue2> : Singleton<TValue1>
{
public TValue2 Value2 { get; private set; }
public Pair(TValue1 value1, TValue2 value2, Func<Pair<TValue1, TValue2>, String> toStringFunc)
: this(value1, value2, () => toStringFunc(this)) { } //Red light
}2> : Singleton<TValue1>
回答1:
I'm pretty sure I've heard that this is a compiler bug, fixed in the next release. I'm just firing up my 4.0 VM, with a simpler test-case:
class Foo {
public Foo() : this(delegate { this.Bar(); }) { }
public Foo(Action foo) {}
public void Bar() {}
}
works in VS2008, but in VS2010:
Error 1 Keyword 'this' is not available in the current context
回答2:
This is a bug in the C# 3 compiler that is fixed in C# 4.
Edit:
Corner case in using lambdas expression in base constructor
回答3:
Your constructor will loop forever, until it pops the stack. This is because it keeps calling itself recursively. Try splitting it up:
public Pair(TValue1 value1, TValue2 value2)
: this(value1, value2, () => toStringFunc(this)) { }
public Pair(TValue1 value1, TValue2 value2, Func<Pair<TValue1, TValue2>, String> toStringFunc)
{ /* some actual logic */ }
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2023640/cannot-use-this-in-member-initializer