问题
This might seem like a silly question but I haven't been able to find a clear answer.
This website states that the dash is optional in
ps aux
However, ps aux
works but ps -aux
brings up the error no user named 'x'
. Any ideas what the issue may be here? Running Mac 10.8.2. Thanks
回答1:
man ps
will give you this:
The biggest change is in the interpretation of the -u option, which now displays processes belonging to the specified username(s). Thus, "ps -aux" will fail (unless you want to know about user "x"). As a conve- nience, however, "ps aux" still works as it did in Tiger.
回答2:
Back in the day (from the late 1970s), there were basically two varieties of UNIX, the AT&T version from Bell Labs and the BSD version from UC Berkeley. The options to ps were different in the two versions. OS X now mostly conforms to the modern UNIX standard which follows the AT&T options to ps. But since the BSD ps didn't require a leading '-' option and so many people were used to typing 'ps aux', Apple has decided to leave that sequence with its original BSD interpretation.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/15102576/ps-aux-works-but-ps-aux-doesnt