mem_fun and bind1st problem

本秂侑毒 提交于 2019-12-20 03:07:50

问题


I've following class:

class A {
public:
// ctr and etc ...
A*   clone(B* container);
};

Now, I've a vector<A*> availableObjs populated already. I want to call clone on each of those, so and insert cloned objects into a new container clonedObjs of type vector<A*>. I'm trying following - but it doesn't compile:

transform(availableObjs.begin(), availableObjs.end(), back_inserter(clonedObjs),
    bind1st(mem_fun(&A::clone), container)); // container is of type B*

Is there a easy way out? I've a lot classed like A - so making each of those a functor is too much task.


回答1:


You need to use bind2nd instead of bind1st:

transform(availableObjs.begin(), availableObjs.end(), back_inserter(clonedObjs),
    bind2nd(mem_fun(&A::clone), container)); // container is of type B*

The functor created by mem_fun(&A::clone) expects an A* as its first parameter. This is the normally implicitly specified instance on which the method is called. The first "real" parameter of A::clone is the second parameter of mem_fun(&A::clone) and therefore needs to be bound with bind2nd.




回答2:


If you use Boost.Bind it might look like this:

std::transform(
               availableObjs.begin(), availableObjs.end(), 
               back_inserter(clonedObjs),
               boost::bind<A*>(boost::mem_fn(&A::clone), _1, container) ); 


来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1762781/mem-fun-and-bind1st-problem

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!