问题
I have been playing with the deepcopy function and the copy function and I get the same issue with both of them. It is like the copy was a reference (or a pointer) instead of a proper copy. I am working with data records (classes) in Python, maybe it could be that.. I show you an example:
>>> import copy
>>> class player1:
... age = 23
... score = 1
>>> class player2:
... age = 14
... score = 2
>>> player3 = copy.deepcopy(player1)
I print the parameters.
>>> print player1.age, player1.score
23 1
>>> print player2.age, player2.score
14 2
>>> print player3.age, player3.score
23 1
Now I increment the score parameter in player1 data record.
>>> player1.score += 3
And I print the results again.
>>> print player1.age, player1.score
23 4
>>> print player2.age, player2.score
14 2
>>> print player3.age, player3.score
23 4
WHY HAS PLAYER 3 CHANGED? I just incremented a parameter in player1, not player3. It is mutable instead of immutable.
Thanks in advance.
回答1:
The problem is that you are actually copying the class definition and not an instance of the class.
Another problem of the code is that the attributes age
and score
are part of the class and will be shared between all instances of that class. This is probably not what you intended.
What you probably want to do is:
import copy
class Player:
def __init__(self, age, score):
self.age = age
self.score = score
player1 = Player(23, 1)
player2 = Player(14, 2)
player3 = copy.deepcopy(player1)
player1.age += 1
print "player1.age", player1.age
print "player3.age", player3.age
This gives you what you expect:
player1.age 24
player3.age 23
回答2:
From the documentation (emphasis mine):
This version does not copy types like module, class, function, method, nor stack trace, stack frame, nor file, socket, window, nor array, nor any similar types.
You're trying to copy classes, and so:
>>> player3 = copy.deepcopy(player1)
>>> player1 is player3
True
but
>>> p1 = player1()
>>> p2 = player2()
>>> p3 = copy.deepcopy(p1)
>>> p1 is p3
False
回答3:
This is working as designed.
In your sample code, you are copying class definitions, not object instances. From copy
module manual page:
It does “copy” functions and classes (shallow and deeply), by returning the original object
unchanged
Hence:
player3 = copy.deepcopy(player1)
is the same as:
player3 = player1
However, if you copied instances of the classes, you would get the expected result:
player3 = copy.deepcopy(player1())
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22079916/python-copy-deepcopy-function-not-working-properly