问题
I'm receiving a double definition error on the following two methods:
def apply[T](state: T, onRender: T => Graphic,
onMouseEvent: (MouseEvent, T) => T): GraphicPanel =
apply(state, onRender, onMouseEvent = Some(onMouseEvent))
and
def apply[T](state: T, onRender: T => Graphic,
onKeyEvent: (KeyEvent, T) => T): GraphicPanel =
apply(state, onRender, onKeyEvent = Some(onKeyEvent))
which are both method overloads for the more general apply
method with the signature:
def apply[T](state: T, onRender: T => Graphic,
onTickEvent: Option[T => T] = None, fps: Int = 30,
onMouseEvent: Option[(MouseEvent, T) => T] = None,
onMouseMotionEvent: Option[(MouseEvent, T) => T] = None,
onMouseInputEvent: Option[(MouseEvent, T) => T] = None,
onKeyEvent: Option[(KeyEvent, T) => T] = None)
I would assume that a even though the classes KeyEvent
and MouseEvent
have a common superclass (InputEvent
), the compiler should still be able to distinguish between them. However, it is throwing the error:
double definition: method apply:[T](state: T, onRender: T => edu.depauw.scales.graphics.Graphic, someOnKeyEvent: (java.awt.event.KeyEvent, T) => T)edu.depauw.scales.graphics.GraphicPanel and method apply:[T](state: T, onRender: T => edu.depauw.scales.graphics.Graphic, onMouseEvent: (java.awt.event.MouseEvent, T) => T)edu.depauw.scales.graphics.GraphicPanel at line 115 have same type after erasure: (state: Object, onRender: Function1, someOnKeyEvent: Function2) edu.depauw.scales.graphics.GraphicPanel
Anyone have any idea what is going on? Admittedly, I don't know what is meant by the phrase "after erasure", so maybe an explanation of how that works might be helpful.
回答1:
Here's a simpler example that shows the same issue:
object Example {
def foo[T](f: Int => T) = ???
def foo[T](f: String => T) = ???
}
This is equivalent to the following, after desugaring the =>
symbols:
object Example {
def foo[T](f: Function[Int, T]) = ???
def foo[T](f: Function[String, T]) = ???
}
The problem is that the Java Virtual Machine doesn't know about generics (in either Scala or Java), so it sees these two methods as the following:
object Example {
def foo[T](f: Function) = ???
def foo[T](f: Function) = ???
}
Which is clearly a problem.
This is one of many reasons to avoid method overloading in Scala. If that's not an option, you could use a trick like the following:
object Example {
implicit object `Int => T disambiguator`
implicit object `String => T disambiguator`
def foo[T](f: Int => T)(implicit d: `Int => T disambiguator`.type) = ???
def foo[T](f: String => T)(implicit d: `String => T disambiguator`.type) = ???
}
Which looks the same usage-wise, but is obviously pretty hideous.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/17841993/double-definition-error-despite-different-parameter-types