问题
MSDN states that
long, ulong, double, and decimal, as well as user-defined types, are not guaranteed to be atomic 5.5 Atomicity of variable references
Will Volatile.Write Method (Double%, Double) work as atomic operation? If so how this is guaranteed?
Is it safe to do Volatile.Write(ref mydouble, value); in one thread and Volatile.Read(ref mydouble) in another where mydouble has double type?
That was general question. Another question - what should I do in this particular situation:
- 2 processors Xeon x64 server
- Windows + MS .NET 4.5
- read/write double from different threads
- SMALLEST latency (need smallest because i'm writing HFT software)
回答1:
Unless you really need the performance, you probably want Interlocked instead, either Interlocked.Exchange or Interlocked.Read
Update: No, Volatile is not atomic, and it is not safe in an SMP (>1 processor) system to assume so. It is safe on a uniprocessor machine.
回答2:
If you really care about latency that much, then you need to stop writting to the same location from different threads. Can you expand on what you're solving?
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12435325/does-volatile-read-volatile-write-for-double-atomic