问题
I have this C++ test code snippet,
#include <vector>
class A {
std::vector<int> x;
public:
A(std::vector<int>&& _x) : x(_x) {}
};
class B {
A a;
public:
B(std::vector<int>&& _x) : a(/*move(*/_x/*)*/) {}
};
I'm passing _x
to B as rvalue reference, but it's getting converted to lvalue when passed into A
's constructor and I have to use std::move()
to make it work. My question is why _x is lvalue and not an rvalue reference in a()
?
回答1:
Quote from WIKI
For safety reasons, some restrictions are imposed. A named variable will never be considered to be an rvalue even if it is declared as such. To get an rvalue, the function template std::move() should be used. Rvalue references can also be modified only under certain circumstances, being intended to be used primarily with move constructors.
回答2:
Anything that has a name is an lvalue reference. You have to use std::move on parameters to pass them on as rvalue references.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/40350029/cant-bind-lvalue-to-rvalue-reference