问题
I have these classes:
class Foo<T1, T2> : Form
where T1, T2 : EventArgs
class MiddleGoo : Foo<X,Y>
class Goo : MiddleGoo
X,Y are just simple classes derived from EventArgs.
I see Goo in designer, but i want to create a class Boo between Foo and Goo like this:
class Boo<T1, Y> : Foo<T1, Y>
where T1 : EventArgs
class MiddleGoo : Boo<X,Y>
class Goo : MiddleGoo
Workaround with middle class doesn't work, any ideas?
EDIT: I meant Y and X are classes like YEventArgs and XEventArgs and my problem is about seeing in designer class Boo when i defined Y as T2 but still want to keep it generic through T1.
EDIT2: I just realized I misspelled something about Y class...
public class Foo<T1, T2> : Form
where T1 : EventArgs
where T2 : EventArgs
{
}
public class Boo<T1> : Foo<T1, MyEventArgs2>
where T1 : EventArgs
{
}
public class MiddleGoo : Boo<MyEventArgs1>
{
}
class Goo : MiddleGoo
{
}
public class MyEventArgs2 : EventArgs
{
}
public class MyEventArgs1 : EventArgs
{
}
And to be clear I just can't see Boo in Designer... ( I can't see MiddleGoo too but i don't need to)
回答1:
For Visual Studio Version >= VS2015.1
Starting from VS2015.1, Windows Forms Designer shows classes which have generic base classe without any problem. So the workaround which is in other posts is no more required for newer versions of VS and the following class will be shown in designer without any problem.
So having a base generic class like this:
public class BaseForm<TModel,TService> : Form
{
public TModel Model {get;set;}
public TService Service {get; set;}
}
You can create the derived form without any problem in designer:
public class FooForm: BaseForm<Foo,FooService>
{
}
Older Versions of Visual Studio
In older versions of Visual Studio, when the designer wants to host your form in designer, it tries to create an instance of base class of your form, and your class must have a non-generic base to so the designer can show it.
So you can see BaseForm<T>:Form
can be shown in designer but CategoryForm:BaseForm<Category>
can not be shown in designer. As a workaround in these cases you should create a BaseCategoryForm:BaseForm<Category>
and then CategoryForm:BaseCategoryForm
will be shown in designer.
Example
Suppose this is your base class that accepts TModel as Model and TService as Service for example:
public class BaseForm<TModel,TService> : Form
{
public TModel Model {get;set;}
public TService Service {get; set;}
}
Then create an intermediate form this way, with this line of code:
Public Class BaseFooForm: BaseForm<Foo, FooService>{ }
And the final form this way:
public class FooForm: BaseFooForm
{
}
Now the final FooForm
has designer and you can work with it normally. This way you can create your classes to be supported in designer.
Note
The update is also applied on control designer. So also in generic base class for WinForm UserControl you no more need such workaround for VS>=VS2015.1
.
回答2:
The T2
Type parameter in Foo
class needs to be convertible to EventArgs
. But when you are defining your Boo
class, you aren't including that constraint. Change your Boo
class to this:
class Boo<T1, Y> : Foo<T1, Y>
where T1 : EventArgs
where Y : EventArgs
Also, you have got a syntax error at the Foo
class declaration. Change it to :
class Foo<T1, T2>
where T1 : EventArgs
where T2 : EventArgs
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33112724/windows-forms-generic-inheritance