Are Haskell FlexibleInstances a stable extension to the language?

柔情痞子 提交于 2019-12-18 05:27:20

问题


What is the problem with FlexibleInstances in Haskell? Why are they not included in Haskell 2010? Were implementations of FlexibleInstances simply not stable enough for inclusion into a standard or are deeper concerns connected to FlexibleInstances? Is it safe to use them? Will they likely be included in Haskell Prime?


回答1:


Is it safe to use them?

Yes. FlexibleInstances will not create an ambiguous or overlapping situation when GHC needs to resolve type classes. Note that the potential for overlap of the instances is possible and not an error, but any actual confusing usage during type checking will be an error.

Will they likely be included in Haskell Prime?

I have no idea, I am not part of Haskell Prime. There is a mailing list, archived at gmane. The ticket tracking this is number 32.



来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/8367423/are-haskell-flexibleinstances-a-stable-extension-to-the-language

标签
易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!