Performance tuning on INNER JOIN with BETWEEN Condition

问题

I have two table's namely tbl_Small and tbl_Large.

Both the table's I have stored in Microsoft Azure and querying from Microsoft SQL Server.

--Table 1: Tbl_Small

CREATE TABLE tbl_Small
(
    cola int
);

INSERT INTO tbl_Small VALUES(1234),(123),(34); 
--1000 rows

--Table 2: tbl_Large

CREATE TABLE tbl_Large
(
    ID bigint identity(1,1),
    cola int,
    colb int,
    colc varchar(100)
);

INSERT INTO tbl_Large(cola,colb,colc) VALUES(0,140,'A'),(150,200,'C'),(1000,15000,'D');
--30 million rows 

I want to get large table details by joining small table with between condition.

My try:

1. Created NONCLUSTERED index on tbl_Small(cola).
2. Created NONCLUSTERED index on tbl_Large(cola) and tbl_Large(colb).

Query:

SELECT s.cola as [Input],l.cola,l.colb,l.colc
FROM tbl_Large AS l
INNER JOIN tbl_Small s ON s.cola BETWEEN l.cola and l.colb

Note: The above query's execution time is over 10 minutes.

Edit: After adding nonclustered index on all columns as said in answer, I got the following execution plan.

Time taken for execution: 5 min

DTU Percentage graph:

回答1:

Your index on tbl_Large needs to be covering i.e. it holds all the data the query needs. If you just create an index on the one column then to get all the data the server will need to use the index and another source to get the other column data. It's probable it won't find it worth the extra work and will ignore the index all together.

For tbl_Large create an index on both col a and col b and also include the value for col c so the code looks like this:

CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX IX_tbl_Large_cola_colb on tbl_Large (cola, colb)
INCLUDE (colc)

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58832990/performance-tuning-on-inner-join-with-between-condition