问题
Is there any way to make a user-defined macro in Airflow which is itself computed from other macros?
from airflow import DAG
from airflow.operators.bash_operator import BashOperator
dag = DAG(
'simple',
schedule_interval='0 21 * * *',
user_defined_macros={
'next_execution_date': '{{ dag.following_schedule(execution_date) }}',
},
)
task = BashOperator(
task_id='bash_op',
bash_command='echo "{{ next_execution_date }}"',
dag=dag,
)
The use case here is to back-port the new Airflow v1.8 next_execution_date macro to work in Airflow v1.7. Unfortunately, this template is rendered without macro expansion:
$ airflow render simple bash_op 2017-08-09 21:00:00
# ----------------------------------------------------------
# property: bash_command
# ----------------------------------------------------------
echo "{{ dag.following_schedule(execution_date) }}"
回答1:
Here are some solutions:
1. Override BashOperator to add some values to the context
class NextExecutionDateAwareBashOperator(BashOperator):
def render_template(self, attr, content, context):
dag = context['dag']
execution_date = context['execution_date']
context['next_execution_date'] = dag.following_schedule(execution_date)
return super().render_templates(attr, content, context)
# or in python 2:
# return super(NextExecutionDateAwareBashOperator, self).render_templates(attr, content, context)
The good part with this approach: you can capture some repeated code in your custom operator.
The bad part: you have to write a custom operator to add values to the context, before templated fields are rendered.
2. Do your computation in a user defined macro
Macros are not necessarily values. They can be functions.
In your dag :
def compute_next_execution_date(dag, execution_date):
return dag.following_schedule(execution_date)
dag = DAG(
'simple',
schedule_interval='0 21 * * *',
user_defined_macros={
'next_execution_date': compute_next_execution_date,
},
)
task = BashOperator(
task_id='bash_op',
bash_command='echo "{{ next_execution_date(dag, execution_date) }}"',
dag=dag,
)
The good part: you can define reusable functions to process values available at runtime (XCom values, job instance properties, task instance properties, etc...), and make your function result available to render a template.
The bad part (but not that annoying): you have to import such a function as a user defined macro in every dag where needed.
3. Call your statement directly in your template
This solution is the simplest (as mentioned by Ardan's answer), and probably the good one in your case.
BashOperator(
task_id='bash_op',
bash_command='echo "{{ dag.following_schedule(execution_date) }}"',
dag=dag,
)
Ideal for simple calls like this one. And they are some other objects directly available as macros (like task, task_instance, etc...); even some standard modules are available (like macros.time, ...).
回答2:
I would vote for making Airflow Plugin to inject your pre-defined macros. Using this method, you can use your pre-defined macro in any Operator without declare anything.
Below are some custom macros that we're using.
Example using: {{ macros.dagtz_next_execution_date(ti) }}
from airflow.plugins_manager import AirflowPlugin
from datetime import datetime, timedelta
from airflow.utils.db import provide_session
from airflow.models import DagRun
import pendulum
@provide_session
def _get_dag_run(ti, session=None):
"""Get DagRun obj of the TaskInstance ti
Args:
ti (TYPE): the TaskInstance object
session (None, optional): Not in use
Returns:
DagRun obj: the DagRun obj of the TaskInstance ti
"""
task = ti.task
dag_run = None
if hasattr(task, 'dag'):
dag_run = (
session.query(DagRun)
.filter_by(
dag_id=task.dag.dag_id,
execution_date=ti.execution_date)
.first()
)
session.expunge_all()
session.commit()
return dag_run
def ds_add_no_dash(ds, days):
"""
Add or subtract days from a YYYYMMDD
:param ds: anchor date in ``YYYYMMDD`` format to add to
:type ds: str
:param days: number of days to add to the ds, you can use negative values
:type days: int
>>> ds_add('20150101', 5)
'20150106'
>>> ds_add('20150106', -5)
'20150101'
"""
ds = datetime.strptime(ds, '%Y%m%d')
if days:
ds = ds + timedelta(days)
return ds.isoformat()[:10].replace('-', '')
def dagtz_execution_date(ti):
"""get the TaskInstance execution date (in DAG timezone) in pendulum obj
Args:
ti (TaskInstance): the TaskInstance object
Returns:
pendulum obj: execution_date in pendulum object (in DAG tz)
"""
execution_date_pdl = pendulum.instance(ti.execution_date)
dagtz_execution_date_pdl = execution_date_pdl.in_timezone(ti.task.dag.timezone)
return dagtz_execution_date_pdl
def dagtz_next_execution_date(ti):
"""get the TaskInstance next execution date (in DAG timezone) in pendulum obj
Args:
ti (TaskInstance): the TaskInstance object
Returns:
pendulum obj: next execution_date in pendulum object (in DAG tz)
"""
# For manually triggered dagruns that aren't run on a schedule, next/previous
# schedule dates don't make sense, and should be set to execution date for
# consistency with how execution_date is set for manually triggered tasks, i.e.
# triggered_date == execution_date.
dag_run = _get_dag_run(ti)
if dag_run and dag_run.external_trigger:
next_execution_date = ti.execution_date
else:
next_execution_date = ti.task.dag.following_schedule(ti.execution_date)
next_execution_date_pdl = pendulum.instance(next_execution_date)
dagtz_next_execution_date_pdl = next_execution_date_pdl.in_timezone(ti.task.dag.timezone)
return dagtz_next_execution_date_pdl
def dagtz_next_ds(ti):
"""get the TaskInstance next execution date (in DAG timezone) in YYYY-MM-DD string
"""
dagtz_next_execution_date_pdl = dagtz_next_execution_date(ti)
return dagtz_next_execution_date_pdl.strftime('%Y-%m-%d')
def dagtz_next_ds_nodash(ti):
"""get the TaskInstance next execution date (in DAG timezone) in YYYYMMDD string
"""
dagtz_next_ds_str = dagtz_next_ds(ti)
return dagtz_next_ds_str.replace('-', '')
def dagtz_prev_execution_date(ti):
"""get the TaskInstance previous execution date (in DAG timezone) in pendulum obj
Args:
ti (TaskInstance): the TaskInstance object
Returns:
pendulum obj: previous execution_date in pendulum object (in DAG tz)
"""
# For manually triggered dagruns that aren't run on a schedule, next/previous
# schedule dates don't make sense, and should be set to execution date for
# consistency with how execution_date is set for manually triggered tasks, i.e.
# triggered_date == execution_date.
dag_run = _get_dag_run(ti)
if dag_run and dag_run.external_trigger:
prev_execution_date = ti.execution_date
else:
prev_execution_date = ti.task.dag.previous_schedule(ti.execution_date)
prev_execution_date_pdl = pendulum.instance(prev_execution_date)
dagtz_prev_execution_date_pdl = prev_execution_date_pdl.in_timezone(ti.task.dag.timezone)
return dagtz_prev_execution_date_pdl
def dagtz_prev_ds(ti):
"""get the TaskInstance prev execution date (in DAG timezone) in YYYY-MM-DD string
"""
dagtz_prev_execution_date_pdl = dagtz_prev_execution_date(ti)
return dagtz_prev_execution_date_pdl.strftime('%Y-%m-%d')
def dagtz_prev_ds_nodash(ti):
"""get the TaskInstance prev execution date (in DAG timezone) in YYYYMMDD string
"""
dagtz_prev_ds_str = dagtz_prev_ds(ti)
return dagtz_prev_ds_str.replace('-', '')
# Defining the plugin class
class AirflowTestPlugin(AirflowPlugin):
name = "custom_macros"
macros = [dagtz_execution_date, ds_add_no_dash,
dagtz_next_execution_date, dagtz_next_ds, dagtz_next_ds_nodash,
dagtz_prev_execution_date, dagtz_prev_ds, dagtz_prev_ds_nodash]
回答3:
user_defined_macros are not processed as templates by default. If you want to keep a template in a user_defined_macro (or if you use a template in a params variable), you can always re-run the templating function manually:
class DoubleTemplatedBashOperator(BashOperator):
def pre_execute(self, context):
context['ti'].render_templates()
And this will work for templates that don't also reference other parameters or UDMs. This way, you can have "two-deep" templates.
Or put your UDM directly in the BashOperator's command instead (the easiest solution):
BashOperator(
task_id='bash_op',
bash_command='echo "{{ dag.following_schedule(execution_date) }}"',
dag=dag,
)
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/44855949/make-custom-airflow-macros-expand-other-macros