differences between 2 JUnit Assert classes

这一生的挚爱 提交于 2019-11-27 05:59:58
Mnementh

The old method (of JUnit 3) was to mark the test-classes by extending junit.framework.TestCase. That inherited junit.framework.Assert itself and your test class gained the ability to call the assert methods this way.

Since version 4 of JUnit, the framework uses Annotations for marking tests. So you no longer need to extend TestCase. But that means, the assert methods aren't available. But you can make a static import of the new Assert class. That's why all the assert methods in the new class are static methods. So you can import it this way:

import static org.junit.Assert.*;

After this static import, you can use this methods without prefix.

At the redesign they also moved to the new package org.junit that follows better the normal conventions for package naming.

ReneS

JUnit 3.X: junit.framework.Assert

JUnit 4.X: org.junit.Assert

Prefer the newest one, especially when running JDK5 and higher with annotation support.

There is in fact a functional change: org.junit.Assert will complain if you use the two-argument assertEquals() with float or double, while junit.framework.Assert will silently autobox it.

I believe they are refactoring from junit.framework to org.junit and junit.framework.Assert is maintained for backwards compatibility.

guerda

I did a rough source code compare and there are no serious changes. A lot of comments were added in org.junit.Assert and some refactorings are done. The only change is the comparison with Arrays. There are some code cleanups, but there's (imho) no functional change.

In Android Studio (and so in IntelliJ too), you can globally exclude junit.framework from auto-import proposal.

You can set the scope between IDE or Project. If you don't have projects which use JUnit 3 you can safely stay with IDE scope.

Setting position:

Preferences -> Editor -> General -> Auto Import

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!