问题
As an OpenMP & Rcpp performance test I wanted to check how fast I could calculate the Mandelbrot set in R using the most straightforward and simple Rcpp+OpenMP implementation. Currently what I did was:
#include <Rcpp.h>
#include <omp.h>
// [[Rcpp::plugins(openmp)]]
using namespace Rcpp;
// [[Rcpp::export]]
Rcpp::NumericMatrix mandelRcpp(const double x_min, const double x_max, const double y_min, const double y_max,
const int res_x, const int res_y, const int nb_iter) {
Rcpp::NumericMatrix ret(res_x, res_y);
double x_step = (x_max - x_min) / res_x;
double y_step = (y_max - y_min) / res_y;
int r,c;
#pragma omp parallel for default(shared) private(c) schedule(dynamic,1)
for (r = 0; r < res_y; r++) {
for (c = 0; c < res_x; c++) {
double zx = 0.0, zy = 0.0, new_zx;
double cx = x_min + c*x_step, cy = y_min + r*y_step;
int n = 0;
for (n=0; (zx*zx + zy*zy < 4.0 ) && ( n < nb_iter ); n++ ) {
new_zx = zx*zx - zy*zy + cx;
zy = 2.0*zx*zy + cy;
zx = new_zx;
}
ret(c,r) = n;
}
}
return ret;
}
And then in R:
library(Rcpp)
sourceCpp("mandelRcpp.cpp")
xlims=c(-0.74877,-0.74872);
ylims=c(0.065053,0.065103);
x_res=y_res=1080L; nb_iter=10000L;
system.time(m <- mandelRcpp(xlims[[1]], xlims[[2]], ylims[[1]], ylims[[2]], x_res, y_res, nb_iter))
# 0.92s
rainbow=c(rgb(0.47,0.11,0.53),rgb(0.27,0.18,0.73),rgb(0.25,0.39,0.81),rgb(0.30,0.57,0.75),rgb(0.39,0.67,0.60),rgb(0.51,0.73,0.44),rgb(0.67,0.74,0.32),rgb(0.81,0.71,0.26),rgb(0.89,0.60,0.22),rgb(0.89,0.39,0.18),rgb(0.86,0.13,0.13))
cols=c(colorRampPalette(rainbow)(100),rev(colorRampPalette(rainbow)(100)),"black") # palette
par(mar=c(0, 0, 0, 0))
system.time(image(m^(1/7), col=cols, asp=diff(ylims)/diff(xlims), axes=F, useRaster=T))
# 0.5s
I was unsure though if there is any other obvious speed improvements I could take advantage of aside from OpenMP multithreading, e.g. via simd vectorization? (using simd options in the openmp #pragma didn't seem to do anything)
PS at first my code was crashing but I later found this was solved by replacing ret[r,c] = n; with ret(r,c) = n;
Using Armadillo classes as suggested in the answer below make things very slightly faster, though the timings are almost the same. Also flipped around x and y so it comes out in the right orientation when plotted with image(). Using 8 threads speed is ca. 350 times faster than the vectorized plain R Mandelbrot version here and also about 7.3 times faster than the (non-multithreaded) Python/Numba version here (similar to PyCUDA or PyOpenCL speeds), so quite happy with that... Rasterizing/display now seems the bottleneck in R....
回答1:
Do not use OpenMP with Rcpp's *Vector or *Matrix objects as they mask SEXP functions / memory allocations that are single-threaded. OpenMP is a multi-threaded approach.
This is why the code is crashing.
One way to get around this limitation is to use a non-R data structure to store the results. One of the following will be sufficient: arma::mat or Eigen::MatrixXd or std::vector<T>... As I favor armadillo, I will change the res matrix to arma::mat from Rcpp::NumericMatrix. Thus, the following will execute your code in parallel:
#include <RcppArmadillo.h> // Note the changed include and new attribute
// [[Rcpp::depends(RcppArmadillo)]]
// Avoid including header if openmp not on system
#ifdef _OPENMP
#include <omp.h>
#endif
// [[Rcpp::plugins(openmp)]]
// Note the changed return type
// [[Rcpp::export]]
arma::mat mandelRcpp(const double x_min, const double x_max,
const double y_min, const double y_max,
const int res_x, const int res_y, const int nb_iter) {
arma::mat ret(res_x, res_y); // note change
double x_step = (x_max - x_min) / res_x;
double y_step = (y_max - y_min) / res_y;
unsigned r,c;
#pragma omp parallel for shared(res)
for (r = 0; r < res_y; r++) {
for (c = 0; c < res_x; c++) {
double zx = 0.0, zy = 0.0, new_zx;
double cx = x_min + c*x_step, cy = y_min + r*y_step;
unsigned n = 0;
for (; (zx*zx + zy*zy < 4.0 ) && ( n < nb_iter ); n++ ) {
new_zx = zx*zx - zy*zy + cx;
zy = 2.0*zx*zy + cy;
zx = new_zx;
}
if(n == nb_iter) {
n = 0;
}
ret(r, c) = n;
}
}
return ret;
}
With the test code (note y and x were not defined, thus I assumed y = ylims and x = xlims) we have:
xlims = ylims = c(-2.0, 2.0)
x_res = y_res = 400L
nb_iter = 256L
system.time(m <-
mandelRcpp(xlims[[1]], xlims[[2]],
ylims[[1]], ylims[[2]],
x_res, y_res, nb_iter))
rainbow = c(
rgb(0.47, 0.11, 0.53),
rgb(0.27, 0.18, 0.73),
rgb(0.25, 0.39, 0.81),
rgb(0.30, 0.57, 0.75),
rgb(0.39, 0.67, 0.60),
rgb(0.51, 0.73, 0.44),
rgb(0.67, 0.74, 0.32),
rgb(0.81, 0.71, 0.26),
rgb(0.89, 0.60, 0.22),
rgb(0.89, 0.39, 0.18),
rgb(0.86, 0.13, 0.13)
)
cols = c(colorRampPalette(rainbow)(100),
rev(colorRampPalette(rainbow)(100)),
"black") # palette
par(mar = c(0, 0, 0, 0))
image(m,
col = cols,
asp = diff(range(ylims)) / diff(range(xlims)),
axes = F)
For:
回答2:
I went ahead and vectorized the OP's code using GCC's and Clang's vector extensions. Before I show how I did this let me show the performance with the following hardware:
Skylake (SKL) at 3.1 GHz with 4 cores
Knights Landing (KNL) at 1.5 GHz with 68 cores
ARMv8 Cortex-A57 arch64 (Nvidia Jetson TX1) 4 cores at ? GHz
nb_iter = 1000000
GCC Clang
SKL_scalar 6m5,422s
SKL_SSE41 3m18,058s
SKL_AVX2 1m37,843s 1m39,943s
SKL_scalar_omp 0m52,237s
SKL_SSE41_omp 0m29,624s 0m31,356s
SKL_AVX2_omp 0m14,156s 0m16,783s
ARM_scalar 15m28.285s
ARM_vector 9m26.384s
ARM_scalar_omp 3m54.242s
ARM_vector_omp 2m21.780s
KNL_scalar 19m34.121s
KNL_SSE41 11m30.280s
KNL_AVX2 5m0.005s 6m39.568s
KNL_AVX512 2m40.934s 6m20.061s
KNL_scalar_omp 0m9.108s
KNL_SSE41_omp 0m6.666s 0m6.992s
KNL_AVX2_omp 0m2.973s 0m3.988s
KNL_AVX512_omp 0m1.761s 0m3.335s
The theoretical speed up of KNL vs. SKL is
(68 cores/4 cores)*(1.5 GHz/3.1 Ghz)*
(8 doubles per lane/4 doubles per lane) = 16.45
I went into detail about GCC's and Clang's vector extensions capabilities here. To vectorize the OP's code here are three additional vector operations that we need to define.
1. Broadcasting
For a vector v and a scalar s GCC cannot do v = s but Clang can. But I found a nice solution which works for GCC and Clang here. For example
vsi v = s - (vsi){};
2. A any() function like in OpenCL or like in R.
The best I came up with is a generic function
static bool any(vli const & x) {
for(int i=0; i<VLI_SIZE; i++) if(x[i]) return true;
return false;
}
Clang actually generates relatively efficient code for this using the ptest instruction (but not for AVX512) but GCC does not.
3. Compression
The calculations are done as 64-bit doubles but the result is written out as 32-bit integers. So two calculations are done using 64-bit integers and then the two calculations are compressed into one vector of 32-bit integers. I came up with a generic solution which Clang does a good job with
static vsi compress(vli const & lo, vli const & hi) {
vsi lo2 = (vsi)lo, hi2 = (vsi)hi, z;
for(int i=0; i<VLI_SIZE; i++) z[i+0*VLI_SIZE] = lo2[2*i];
for(int i=0; i<VLI_SIZE; i++) z[i+1*VLI_SIZE] = hi2[2*i];
return z;
}
The follow solution works better for GCC but is no better for Clang. But since this function is not critical I just use the generic version.
static vsi compress(vli const & low, vli const & high) {
#if defined(__clang__)
return __builtin_shufflevector((vsi)low, (vsi)high, MASK);
#else
return __builtin_shuffle((vsi)low, (vsi)high, (vsi){MASK});
#endif
}
These definitions don't rely on anything x86 specific and the code (defined below) compiles for ARM processors as well with GCC and Clang.
Now that these are defined here is the code
#include <string.h>
#include <inttypes.h>
#include <Rcpp.h>
using namespace Rcpp;
#ifdef _OPENMP
#include <omp.h>
#endif
// [[Rcpp::plugins(openmp)]]
// [[Rcpp::plugins(cpp14)]]
#if defined ( __AVX512F__ ) || defined ( __AVX512__ )
static const int SIMD_SIZE = 64;
#elif defined ( __AVX2__ )
static const int SIMD_SIZE = 32;
#else
static const int SIMD_SIZE = 16;
#endif
static const int VSI_SIZE = SIMD_SIZE/sizeof(int32_t);
static const int VLI_SIZE = SIMD_SIZE/sizeof(int64_t);
static const int VDF_SIZE = SIMD_SIZE/sizeof(double);
#if defined(__clang__)
typedef int32_t vsi __attribute__ ((ext_vector_type(VSI_SIZE)));
typedef int64_t vli __attribute__ ((ext_vector_type(VLI_SIZE)));
typedef double vdf __attribute__ ((ext_vector_type(VDF_SIZE)));
#else
typedef int32_t vsi __attribute__ ((vector_size (SIMD_SIZE)));
typedef int64_t vli __attribute__ ((vector_size (SIMD_SIZE)));
typedef double vdf __attribute__ ((vector_size (SIMD_SIZE)));
#endif
static bool any(vli const & x) {
for(int i=0; i<VLI_SIZE; i++) if(x[i]) return true;
return false;
}
static vsi compress(vli const & lo, vli const & hi) {
vsi lo2 = (vsi)lo, hi2 = (vsi)hi, z;
for(int i=0; i<VLI_SIZE; i++) z[i+0*VLI_SIZE] = lo2[2*i];
for(int i=0; i<VLI_SIZE; i++) z[i+1*VLI_SIZE] = hi2[2*i];
return z;
}
// [[Rcpp::export]]
IntegerVector frac(double x_min, double x_max, double y_min, double y_max, int res_x, int res_y, int nb_iter) {
IntegerVector out(res_x*res_y);
vdf x_minv = x_min - (vdf){}, y_minv = y_min - (vdf){};
vdf x_stepv = (x_max - x_min)/res_x - (vdf){}, y_stepv = (y_max - y_min)/res_y - (vdf){};
double a[VDF_SIZE] __attribute__ ((aligned(SIMD_SIZE)));
for(int i=0; i<VDF_SIZE; i++) a[i] = 1.0*i;
vdf vi0 = *(vdf*)a;
#pragma omp parallel for schedule(dynamic) collapse(2)
for (int r = 0; r < res_y; r++) {
for (int c = 0; c < res_x/(VSI_SIZE); c++) {
vli nv[2] = {0 - (vli){}, 0 - (vli){}};
for(int j=0; j<2; j++) {
vdf c2 = 1.0*VDF_SIZE*(2*c+j) + vi0;
vdf zx = 0.0 - (vdf){}, zy = 0.0 - (vdf){}, new_zx;
vdf cx = x_minv + c2*x_stepv, cy = y_minv + r*y_stepv;
vli t = -1 - (vli){};
for (int n = 0; any(t = zx*zx + zy*zy < 4.0) && n < nb_iter; n++, nv[j] -= t) {
new_zx = zx*zx - zy*zy + cx;
zy = 2.0*zx*zy + cy;
zx = new_zx;
}
}
vsi sp = compress(nv[0], nv[1]);
memcpy(&out[r*res_x + VSI_SIZE*c], (int*)&sp, SIMD_SIZE);
}
}
return out;
}
The R code is almost the same as the OP's code
library(Rcpp)
sourceCpp("frac.cpp", verbose=TRUE, rebuild=TRUE)
xlims=c(-0.74877,-0.74872);
ylims=c(0.065053,0.065103);
x_res=y_res=1080L; nb_iter=100000L;
t = system.time(m <- frac(xlims[[1]], xlims[[2]], ylims[[1]], ylims[[2]], x_res, y_res, nb_iter))
print(t)
m2 = matrix(m, ncol = x_res)
rainbow = c(
rgb(0.47, 0.11, 0.53),
rgb(0.27, 0.18, 0.73),
rgb(0.25, 0.39, 0.81),
rgb(0.30, 0.57, 0.75),
rgb(0.39, 0.67, 0.60),
rgb(0.51, 0.73, 0.44),
rgb(0.67, 0.74, 0.32),
rgb(0.81, 0.71, 0.26),
rgb(0.89, 0.60, 0.22),
rgb(0.89, 0.39, 0.18),
rgb(0.86, 0.13, 0.13)
)
cols = c(colorRampPalette(rainbow)(100),
rev(colorRampPalette(rainbow)(100)),"black") # palette
par(mar = c(0, 0, 0, 0))
image(m2^(1/7), col=cols, asp=diff(ylims)/diff(xlims), axes=F, useRaster=T)
To compile for GCC or Clang change the file ~/.R/Makevars to
CXXFLAGS= -Wall -std=c++14 -O3 -march=native -ffp-contract=fast -fopenmp
#uncomment the following two lines for clang
#CXX=clang-5.0
#LDFLAGS= -lomp
If you are having trouble getting OpenMP to work for Clang see this.
The code produces more or less the same image.
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/48069990/multithreaded-simd-vectorized-mandelbrot-in-r-using-rcpp-openmp