In R, what would be an alternative to ave(), using some function from apply family?

落花浮王杯 提交于 2019-12-13 05:59:20

问题


I am using ave() function to get minimum of observations with the same factor level:

minX = ave(x, list(factorA), FUN=min)

I wonder what would be an alternative using some of the functions from apply family? In particular, what would be an alternative to put proper result back in the dataframe? For example, lets have a small data.frame:

d = data.frame(
    x = c(2,3,3,6,5,7,8,8,9,9),
    factorA = c('a','a','a','a','a','b','b','b','b','b')
)

# function ave automatically enables proper filling of subsets
# defined by the factorA:
d$minX = ave(d$x, list(d$factorA), FUN=min)

# tapply was my first bet, but it does not produce right result:
d$minX2 = tapply(d$x, list(d$factorA), min)

# combination of split and sapply gives back the same wrong
# result as tapply:
d$minX3 = sapply(split(d$x, d$factorA), min)

And here are results and the differences:

d
# x factorA minX minX2 minX3
# 1  2       a    2     2     2
# 2  3       a    2     7     7
# 3  3       a    2     2     2
# 4  6       a    2     7     7
# 5  5       a    2     2     2
# 6  7       b    7     7     7
# 7  8       b    7     2     2
# 8  8       b    7     7     7
# 9  9       b    7     2     2
# 10 9       b    7     7     7

Only ave() returns correct minimum of x given factorA.

Thanks!

来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/32403769/in-r-what-would-be-an-alternative-to-ave-using-some-function-from-apply-fami

标签
易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!