问题
this is somehow follow-up on this question How can I get rid of this "Can not be generalised" error?
given the following types
type IModel<'value, 'target when 'target :> IModel<'value, 'target>> =
abstract value: 'value with get
type IModelSimple<'value, 'target> =
inherit IModel<'value, IModelSimple<'value, 'target>>
abstract ReInitWith: #IModel<_ , _ > -> 'target
and this function returning an object expression
let rec mkModelSimple<'value, 'target> vctor value =
{
new IModelSimple<'value, 'target> with
member this.value = value
member this.ReInitWith m = mkModelSimple vctor this.value
}
I am getting this error
Type mismatch. Expecting a
''target'
but given a
'IModelSimple<'value,'target>'
in the implementation of ReInitWith
.
回答1:
As the compiler reports, you are defining a function where the inferred type contains itself and would be infinite. The way to fix this is to introduce some named type that breaks the recursion. One option is to define a new record with recursive type:
type IModel<'value, 'target when 'target :> IModel<'value, 'target>> =
abstract value: 'value with get
type IModelSimple<'value, 'target> =
inherit IModel<'value, IModelSimple<'value, 'target>>
abstract ReInitWith : #IModel<_, _> -> 'target
type Model<'value, 'target> =
{ Model : IModelSimple<'value, Model<'value, 'target>> }
let rec mkModelSimple<'value, 'target> vctor value =
{ Model =
{ new IModelSimple<'value, Model<'value, 'target>> with
member this.value = value
member this.ReInitWith m =
mkModelSimple<_, _> vctor this.value } }
Just for the record, I think this code is pretty incomprehensible. It is definitely stretching what generics can sensibly do and I'd recommend avoiding doing things like this in production.
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/48813678/how-can-i-get-the-compiler-to-insert-the-correct-type-in-this-example