问题
I have a several classes I don't control, upon which I've already created several identically-named extension methods across several common "attributes". The identically-named extension functions always return the same value type, though calculated in different ways for each type of receiver. Here is a simplified example based on built-in types for just one attribute:
// **DOES NOT COMPILE**
// three sample classes I don't control extended for .len
inline val String.len get() = length
inline val <T> List<T>.len get() = size
inline val <T> Sequence<T>.len get() = count()
// another class which needs to act on things with .len
class Calc<T>(val obj:T) { // HERE IS THE PROBLEM...
val dbl get() = obj?.len * 2 // dummy property that doubles len
// ... and other methods that use .len and other parallel extensions
}
fun main(a:Array<String>) {
val s = "abc"
val l = listOf(5,6,7)
val q = (10..20 step 2).asSequence()
val cs = Calc(s)
val cl = Calc(l)
val cq = Calc(q)
println("Lens: ${cs.dbl}, ${cl.dbl}, ${cq.dbl}")
}
Imagine several other "common" properties extended in the same manner as .len in some classes I don't control. If I don't want to repeat myself in every class, how do I construct a properly typed class that can operate on .len (and other such properties) generically for these three classes?
I've researched the following but not found workable solutions yet:
- generics, in the example above, but can't get the syntax right.
- sealed classes, but I don't have control of these classes.
- union types, which I've found aren't supported in Kotlin.
- wrapper classes, but couldn't get the syntax right.
- passing lambdas a la this blog explanation, but didn't get it right, and it seemed boptimalsu to pass multiple lambdas around for every method.
There must be a better way, right?
回答1:
Here's a example with sealed classes and a single extension property to convert anything to something which can give you len
or double
. Not sure if it has better readability thogh.
val Any?.calc get() = when(this) {
is String -> Calc.CalcString(this)
is List<*> -> Calc.CalcList(this)
is Sequence<*> -> Calc.CalcSequense(this)
else -> Calc.None
}
/* or alternatively without default fallback */
val String.calc get() = Calc.CalcString(this)
val List<*>.calc get() = Calc.CalcList(this)
val Sequence<*>.calc get() = Calc.CalcSequense(this)
/* sealed extension classes */
sealed class Calc {
abstract val len: Int?
val dbl: Int? by lazy(LazyThreadSafetyMode.NONE) { len?.let { it * 2 } }
class CalcString(val s: String): Calc() {
override val len: Int? get() = s.length
}
class CalcList<out T>(val l: List<T>): Calc() {
override val len: Int? get() = l.size
}
class CalcSequense<out T>(val s: Sequence<T>): Calc() {
override val len: Int? get() = s.count()
}
object None: Calc() {
override val len: Int? get() = null
}
}
fun main(args: Array<String>) {
val s = "abc".calc
val l = listOf(5,6,7).calc
val q = (10..20 step 2).asSequence().calc
println("Lens: ${s.dbl}, ${l.dbl}, ${q.dbl}")
}
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47275163/polymorphism-on-extension-functions-in-kotlin