问题
I have a batch statement of Cassandra that contains a delete and an insert statement of same partition key, where delete is the first statement and insert is the second. How the batch statement executes these statements ? Is in the same order in which,we added the statements?
回答1:
No, it does not execute them in the order specified. To force a particular execution order, you can add the USING TIMESTAMP clause. Check the docs for more information: http://docs.datastax.com/en/cql/3.1/cql/cql_reference/batch_r.html
Using time stamp how it can maintain the order of execution . For Example if the above example (delete and insert for same partition key), the final result should be the inserted record. Is that possible by adding time-stamp ??
Yes. I'll combine examples from the link above and the DELETE documentation to demonstrate, and start by creating a simple table called purchases with two fields:
CREATE TABLE purchases (user text PRIMARY KEY, balance bigint);
Next, I'll execute a batch with an INSERT and a DELETE. I'll do the DELETE last, but with an earlier timestamp than the INSERT:
BEGIN BATCH
INSERT INTO purchases (user, balance) VALUES ('user1', -8) USING TIMESTAMP 1432043350384;
DELETE FROM purchases USING TIMESTAMP 1432043345243 WHERE user='user1';
APPLY BATCH;
When I query for userid:
aploetz@cqlsh:stackoverflow2> SELECT user, balance, writetime(balance) FROM purchases WHERE user='user1';
user | balance | writetime(balance)
-------+---------+--------------------
user1 | -8 | 1432043350384
(1 rows)
As you can see, the INSERT persisted because it had the latest timestamp. Whereas if I had simply run the INSERT and DELETE (in that order) from the cqlsh prompt, the query would have returned nothing.
来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/30317877/cassandra-batch-statement-execution-order