Is D powerful enough for these features?

问题

For the longest time I wanted to design a programming language that married extensibility with efficiency (and safety, ease-of-use, etc.) I recently rediscovered D and I am wondering if D 2.0 is pretty much the language I wanted to make myself. What I love most is the potential of metaprogramming; in theory, could D's traits system enable the following features at compile time?

Run-time reflection: Are the compile-time reflection features sufficient to build a run-time reflection system a la Java/.NET?
Code conversion: Using a metaprogram, create C#/C++/etc. versions of your D program every time you compile it (bonus point if doc comments can be propagated).
Traits. I don't mean the metaprogramming traits built into D, I mean object-oriented traits for class composition. A D program would indicate a set of traits to compose, and a metaprogram would compose them.
Unit inference engine: Given some notation for optionally indicating units, e.g. unit(value), could a D metaprogram examine the following code, infer the correct units, and issue an error message on the last line? (I wrote such a thing for boo so I can assure you this is possible in general, program-wide):
```
auto mass = kg(2.0);
auto accel = 1.0;                      // units are strictly optional
auto force = mass*accel;
accel += metresPerSecondSquared(9.81); // units of 'force' and 'accel' are now known
force += pounds(3.0);                  // unit mismatch detected
```

回答1:

Run-time reflection: Are the compile-time reflection features sufficient to build a run-time reflection system a la Java/.NET?

Yes. You can get all the information you need at compile time using __traits and produce the runtime data structures you need for runtime reflection.

Code conversion: Using a metaprogram, create C#/C++/etc. versions of your D program every time you compile it (bonus point if doc comments can be propagated).

No, it simply isn't possible no matter how powerful D is. Some features simply do not transfer over. For example, D has an inline assembler, which is 100% impossible to convert to C#. No language can losslessly convert to all other languages.

Traits. I don't mean the metaprogramming traits built into D, I mean object-oriented traits for class composition. A D program would indicate a set of traits to compose, and a metaprogram would compose them.

You can use template mixins for this, although they don't provide method exclusion.

Unit inference engine: Given some notation for optionally indicating units, e.g. unit(value), could a D metaprogram examine the following code, infer the correct units, and issue an error message on the last line? (I wrote such a thing for boo so I can assure you this is possible in general, program-wide):

Yes, this is straightforward in D. There's at least one implementation already.

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/10962541/is-d-powerful-enough-for-these-features

标签

metaprogramming