Strange error, set<int>::begin() always returning const iterator

问题

Why is set.begin() always returning a const iterator and not a standard one?

35 int test(){
36     std::set<int> myset;
37     myset.insert(2);
38     myset.insert(3);
39     int &res = *myset.begin();
40     return res;
41 }


test.cpp:39: error: invalid initialization of reference of type ‘int&’ from expression of type ‘const int’

回答1:

It's not returning a const_iterator, rather the key_type of std::set<int> is const int.

Remember that keys in a std::set are constant. You can't change a key after it's inserted into the set. So when you dereference the iterator, it necessarily returns a constant reference. So you need to say:

const int &res = *myset.begin();

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4064841/strange-error-setintbegin-always-returning-const-iterator