Why the std::this_thread namespace? [closed]

问题

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.

Closed 6 years ago.

Is there a technical reason for the std::this_thread namespace? Why could the members of this namespace not have been implemented as static members of the std::thread class?

回答1:

From the original proposal, the way to get a thread::id is spelled get_id() whether you are getting the thread::id for yourself, or for a child thread:

Note the use of the this_thread namespace to disambiguate when you are requesting the id for the current thread, vs the id of a child thread. The get_id name for this action remains the same in the interest of reducing the conceptual footprint of the interface.

std::thread my_child_thread(f);
typedef std::thread::id ID;

ID my_id = std::this_thread::get_id();  // The current thread's id
ID your_id = my_child_thread.get_id();  // The child   thread's id

Thus the this_thread namespace is a readable way to differentiate between the two, while keeping the conceptual interface to a minimum (same name for getting a thread id).

Here's a possible alternative design:

struct thread
{
    static int get_id() {return 1;}
    int get_id() const {return 2;}
};

One disadvantage of this design is that it does not compile:

test.cpp:4:9: error: static and non-static member functions with the same parameter types cannot be overloaded
    int get_id() const {return 2;}
        ^
test.cpp:3:16: note: previous declaration is here
    static int get_id() {return 1;}
               ^
1 error generated.

Another design would have given the static member a different name. But now the interface is bigger. The original proposal also treated another function the exact same way:

bool have_i_been_canceled = std::this_thread::cancellation_requested();  // Current thread's cancellation status
bool have_you_been_canceled = my_child_thread.cancellation_requested();  // Child   thread's cancellation status

Thus it made a lot of sense to reuse the names so clients don't have to learn so many names. They just need to learn to use the this_thread namespace if they want to query the current thread. Unfortunately the committee removed thread cancellation during standardization.

来源：https://stackoverflow.com/questions/15032692/why-the-stdthis-thread-namespace