Is there a standard name or implementation of the “purely applicative Either”?

南楼画角 提交于 2019-12-09 05:54:39

问题


I frequently find use for what I call the "purely applicative Either", i.e. Either with the Applicative instance available so long as we don't implement a Monad instance as well.

newtype AEither e a = AEither { unAEither :: Either e a }
  deriving Functor

-- technically we only need Semigroup
instance Monoid e => Applicative (AEither e) where
  pure a = AEither (pure a)
  AEither e1 <*> AEither e2 = AEither (combine e1 e2) where
    combine (Right f) (Right a) = Right (f a)
    combine (Left m1) (Left m2) = Left (m1 <> m2)
    combine (Left m ) _         = Left m
    combine _         (Left m ) = Left m

It's a really useful Applicative as it provides a more powerful notion of "summarization of error" than Either's Monad instance can do. To that end, I find myself implementing it over-and-over again.

Is there a standard instance somewhere? Is there even a standard name?


回答1:


This looks pretty similar to the AccValidation type in the validation package: http://hackage.haskell.org/package/validation-0.3.1/docs/Data-Validation.html

Edit:

In particular the following instance declaration:

instance Semigroup err => Apply (AccValidation err) where
  AccFailure e1 <.> AccFailure e2 =
    AccFailure (e1 <> e2)
  AccFailure e1 <.> AccSuccess _  =
    AccFailure e1
  AccSuccess _  <.> AccFailure e2 =
    AccFailure e2
  AccSuccess f  <.> AccSuccess a  =
    AccSuccess (f a)


来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/22264376/is-there-a-standard-name-or-implementation-of-the-purely-applicative-either

易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!