问题
template <bool Cond, typename Type = void>
using Enable_if = typename std::enable_if<Cond, Type>::type;
class Degree;
template <typename T>
constexpr inline bool Is_Degree() {
return std::is_base_of<Degree, T>::value;
}
class Degree {
public:
std::size_t inDeg = 0;
};
template <typename Satellite = Degree>
class Vertex: public Satellite {
public:
explicit Vertex(int num): n(num) {}
private:
std::size_t n;
};
template <typename Satellite = Degree>
class Edge {
public:
// i want have different constructor depending on
// whether Vertex is (directly or indirectly) derived from Degree
Edge(Enable_if<Is_Degree<Satellite>(), Vertex<Satellite> &>fromVertex,
Vertex<Satellite> &toVertex)
: from(fromVertex), to(toVertex){ ++to.inDeg; }
Edge(Enable_if<!Is_Degree<Satellite>(), Vertex<Satellite> &>fromVertex,
Vertex<Satellite> &toVertex)
: from(fromVertex), to(toVertex){}
private:
Vertex<Satellite> &from;
Vertex<Satellite> &to;
};
The compiler complains at line 2:
"No type named '
type
' in 'std::__1::enable_if<false, Vertex<Degree> &>
': 'enable_if
' cannot be used to disable this declaration."
There is no error if I remove the second constructor of Edge. I want know why, and how to attain my purpose as described in the comment.
回答1:
This is because substitution takes place (and fails) outside of an immediate context. Type template parameters involved in std::enable_if
should come directly from a template that a compiler attempts to instantiate when a function/specialization is required to exist by a context, and that are unknown prior to that point. Otherwise, the compiler is free to reject your code.
A possible workaround is to turn the constructors into templates and default their parameters to the value of the template parameter of the enclosing class:
template <typename S = Satellite>
// ^-----v
Edge(Enable_if<Is_Degree<S>(), Vertex<Satellite> &>fromVertex,
Vertex<Satellite> &toVertex)
: from(fromVertex), to(toVertex){ ++to.inDeg; }
template <typename S = Satellite>
// ^------v
Edge(Enable_if<!Is_Degree<S>(), Vertex<Satellite> &>fromVertex,
Vertex<Satellite> &toVertex)
: from(fromVertex), to(toVertex){}
DEMO
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/32503687/why-compiler-said-enable-if-cannot-be-used-to-disable-this-declaration