Easiest way to make a cyclic iterator (circulator)?

余生颓废 提交于 2019-11-27 01:04:43
Sebastian

Ok, now your problem is clearer :-)

Take a look at boost::iterator_facade and boost::iterator adaptor. They implement the full iterator interface and your cycle_iterator only as to implement a few methods like increment(), decrement():

template<class IteratorBase>
class cycle_iterator 
     : public boost::iterator_adaptor< 
          cycle_iterator,     // the derived class overriding iterator behavior
          IteratorBase,       // the base class providing default behavior
          boost::use_default, // iterator value type, will be IteratorBase::value_type
          std::forward_iterator_tag, // iterator category
          boost::use_default  // iterator reference type
       > 
{
  private:
     IteratorBase m_itBegin;
     IteratorBase m_itEnd;

  public:
     cycle_iterator( IteratorBase itBegin, IteratorBase itEnd ) 
       : iterator_adaptor_(itBegin), m_itBegin(itBegin), m_itEnd(itEnd)
     {}

     void increment() {
        /* Increment the base reference pointer. */
        ++base_reference();

        /* Check if past-the-end element is reached and bring back the base reference to the beginning. */
        if(base_reference() == m_itEnd)
            base_reference() = m_itBegin;
     }

     // implement decrement() and advance() if necessary
  };

This probably doesn't compile but should get you started.

Edit:

boost::iterator_adaptor implements the full iterator interface in terms of few functions. It provides default implementations for increment(), decrement(), advance(), distance_to(), equal_to() and dereference() using the base iterator passed down to the iterator_adaptor base class.

If all you need is a forward iterator, only the increment() method must be implemented to wrap around once you reach the end iterator. A cyclical iterator can be bidirectional if you implement decrement() in a similar fashion. If IteratorBase is itself a random access iterator, the cycle iterator can also be random access and method advance and distance_to must be implemented using modulo operations.

Thomas Witt

boost::iterator adaptor is the way to go, take my word for it ;)

That being said I want to point out a few pitfalls. I don't think I can edit an existing answer, so bear with me.

Given that your base iterator is going to be a vector you need to be careful which core interface functions you need to implement. If you want your cycle_iterator to be a random access iterator you need all of the following:

increment() 
decrement()
advance(n)
distance_to(j)

Now distance_to(j) is a somewhat funny concept for a cycle_iterator and its semantics can get you in all kind of trouble. This can be avoided by restricting the iterator category of the adapted iterator to either forward or bidirectional. Like this:

template <class BaseIterator>
class cycle_iterator
  : public boost::iterator_adaptor<
        cycle_iterator                  // Derived
      , BaseIterator                    // Base
      , boost::use_default              // Value
      , boost::forward_traversal_tag    // CategoryOrTraversal
    >
{ ... };

In this case you only need to implement increment:

void increment()
{
  if (++this->base_reference() == this->m_itEnd)
  {
    this->base_reference() = this->m_itBegin;
  }
}

For a bidirectional you also need decrement:

void decrement()
{
  if (this->base_reference() == this->m_itBegin)
  {
    this->base_reference() = this->m_itEnd;
  }
  --this->base_reference();
}

Disclaimer: I did not run this through a compiler, so I am ready to be embarrassed.

Derive your own collection from std::vector and provide your own iterator implementation that overrides the increment & decrement operators.

There are plenty of tutorials on the web. For example, take a look at this blog post

标签
易学教程内所有资源均来自网络或用户发布的内容,如有违反法律规定的内容欢迎反馈
该文章没有解决你所遇到的问题?点击提问,说说你的问题,让更多的人一起探讨吧!