问题
I am trying to figure out a tight bound in terms of big-O for this snippet:
for(int i = 1 ; i <= n ; i++) {
for(int j = 1; j <= i*i ; j++) {
if (j% i == 0){
for(int k = 0 ; k<j ; k++ )
sum++;
}
}
}
If we start with the inner most loop, it will in worst case run k = n^2 times, which accounts for O(N^2). The if-statement will be true every time j = m*i, where m is an arbitrary constant. Since j runs from 1 to i^2, this will happen when m= {1, 2, ..., i}, which means it will be true i times, and i can at most be n, so the worst case will be m={1,2, ..., n} = n times. The second loop should have a worsts case of O(N^2) if i = n. The outer loop has a worst case complexity of O(N).
I argue that this will combine in the following way: O(N^2) for the inner loop * O(N^2) for the second loop * O(N) for the outer loop gives a worst case time complexity of O(N^5)
However, the if-statement guarantees that we will only reach the inner loop n times, not n^2. But regardless of this, we still need to go through the outer loops n * n^2 times. Does the if-test influence the worst case time complexity for the snippet?
Edit: Corrected for j to i^2, not i.
回答1:
You can simplify the analysis by rewriting your loops without an if
, as follows:
for(int i = 1 ; i <= n ; i++) {
for(int j = 1; j <= i ; j++) {
for(int k = 0 ; k<j*i ; k++ ) {
sum++;
}
}
}
This eliminates steps in which the conditional skips over the "payload" of the loop. The complexity of this equivalent system of loops is O(n4).
回答2:
I analyse your question in a more straightfroward way
we first start by fix i as a costant,
for example, assume it to be k,
so j=1~k^2, when j=k,2k,3k,...,k^2, assume j to be c*k (c=1~k)
the next loop will be executed c^2 times,
so the complexity for a fix i can be expressed as=>
(1+.....+1)+(1+1+...+2^2)+(1+1+...+3^2)+.....+(1+1+...+k^2)
= O(k^3)
so now we set k to be 1~n, so the total complexity will be O(n^4)
来源:https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46130145/time-complexity-on-of-nested-loops-with-if-statement-on4